Suppr超能文献

亲子鉴定计算的局限性。

Limitations of paternity testing calculations.

作者信息

Silver H, Schoppmann A

出版信息

Transfusion. 1987 May-Jun;27(3):288-90. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1987.27387235643.x.

Abstract

A total of 252 black and white trios (mother, child, and putative father) in which the alleged father was known not to be the biological father (BF) were generated from paternity studies. The likelihood of paternity (W) and the paternity index (P) were calculated on the basis of ABO, Rh, MNS, and HLA phenotyping. The results were then reviewed to evaluate the arbitrary limits proposed by a number of states in recent paternity legislation. Two hundred forty-four of 252 non-fathers (NFs) (96.8%) were excluded. Of the 152 white NFs, 147 (96.7%) were excluded; 97 of the 100 blacks (97%) were excluded. Eight NFs could not be excluded by the routinely performed tests. The W value for those eight trios ranged from 1.2 to 98.8 percent. Based on limits proposed in legislation, had the NFs actually been alleged fathers, as many as four of the eight of these men could have had the burden of proving that they were not the BFs.

摘要

从亲子鉴定研究中产生了总共252个黑白三人组(母亲、孩子和推定父亲),其中已知被指控的父亲不是生物学父亲(BF)。根据ABO、Rh、MNS和HLA血型分型计算亲权可能性(W)和亲权指数(P)。然后审查结果,以评估一些州在近期亲子鉴定立法中提出的任意界限。252名非父亲(NFs)中有244名(96.8%)被排除。在152名白人NFs中,147名(96.7%)被排除;100名黑人中有97名(97%)被排除。8名NFs不能通过常规检测排除。这八个三人组的W值范围为1.2%至98.8%。根据立法中提出的界限,如果这些NFs实际上是被指控的父亲,这八名男性中可能多达四人有责任证明他们不是生物学父亲。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验