University of California, San Francisco.
University of California, San Diego.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2018 Dec 1;43(6):941-960. doi: 10.1215/03616878-7104378.
Over the past two decades, US states have enacted legislation regulating ultrasound scanning in abortion care, including mandating that abortion patients view their ultrasound image. Legal scholars have argued that, by constructing ultrasound viewing as a necessary part of patients' abortion decision making, these laws aim to control and constrain how women make personal decisions about their bodies and parenthood. To date, however, the discussion of the impact of ultrasound viewing laws on women's decisional autonomy has occurred in the abstract. Here, we examine the effect of Wisconsin's mandatory ultrasound viewing law on the viewing behavior of women seeking care at a high-volume abortion-providing facility. Drawing both on chart data from patients before and after the law went into effect and on in-depth interviews with women subject to the mandatory viewing law, we found that the presence of the law impacted patients' viewing decision making. Moreover, we documented a differential effect of the law by race, with larger impacts on the viewing behavior of black women compared with white women. Our findings call for renewed attention to the coercive power of laws regulating abortion on a macrolevel, investigating not only how they affect individuals' behavior and experience but also which individuals are impacted.
在过去的二十年中,美国各州已经颁布了规范堕胎护理中超声扫描的立法,包括规定堕胎患者观看其超声图像。法律学者认为,通过将超声检查视为患者堕胎决策的必要组成部分,这些法律旨在控制和限制女性如何对自己的身体和生育做出个人决定。然而,迄今为止,关于超声检查法对妇女决策自主权影响的讨论一直停留在抽象层面。在这里,我们研究了威斯康星州强制性超声检查法对在一家大容量堕胎服务机构寻求护理的妇女的检查行为的影响。我们利用该法律生效前后从患者那里收集的图表数据以及对受强制性检查法约束的妇女的深入访谈,发现该法律确实影响了患者的检查决策。此外,我们还记录了该法律的一个按种族划分的差异效应,对黑人妇女的检查行为的影响大于对白人妇女的影响。我们的研究结果呼吁重新关注规范堕胎的宏观层面的法律的强制力,不仅调查它们如何影响个人的行为和体验,还调查哪些个人受到影响。