• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体格检查:法律责任(与专业规范相对)

Physical Exams: Legal Liability (Versus Professional Norms).

作者信息

Zirkel Perry A

机构信息

University Professor Emeritus of Education and Law Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.

出版信息

NASN Sch Nurse. 2019 Sep;34(5):270-273. doi: 10.1177/1942602X19846641. Epub 2019 May 16.

DOI:10.1177/1942602X19846641
PMID:31092136
Abstract

This article summarizes the facts and rulings of a relatively recent and representative federal appellate court decision concerning a parent's civil rights lawsuit in response to a school nurse's visual examination of a child's "private parts." The discussion of the court's rulings extends to a sampling of related case law and, as in a previous NASN School Nurse Zirkel article, the difference between legal and professional boundaries.

摘要

本文总结了联邦上诉法院最近一项具有代表性的判决的事实和裁决,该判决涉及一位家长针对学校护士对孩子“私密部位”进行目视检查提起的民权诉讼。对法院裁决的讨论还延伸至相关判例法的示例,并且如同美国学校护士协会(NASN)学校护士齐克尔之前发表的一篇文章一样,还探讨了法律界限与专业界限之间的差异。

相似文献

1
Physical Exams: Legal Liability (Versus Professional Norms).体格检查:法律责任(与专业规范相对)
NASN Sch Nurse. 2019 Sep;34(5):270-273. doi: 10.1177/1942602X19846641. Epub 2019 May 16.
2
School Nurse Advocacy: The Dilemma of Ethical Interpretation Versus Legal Protection.学校护士的倡导:道德解读与法律保护的困境
NASN Sch Nurse. 2018 Sep;33(5):288-290. doi: 10.1177/1942602X18784564. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
3
Legal Issues: Advocacy by and Disabilities of School Nurses.法律问题:学校护士的倡导和残疾。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2021 Nov;22(4):253-258. doi: 10.1177/15271544211052034. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
4
Unlicensed administration of medication. the California Supreme Court decision.未经许可的药物管理。加利福尼亚最高法院的判决。
NASN Sch Nurse. 2014 Sep;29(5):248-52. doi: 10.1177/1942602X14540412.
5
Case commentary--Bass v. Barksdale: implications for public health and home care nurses.案例评论——巴斯诉巴克斯代尔案:对公共卫生和家庭护理护士的启示
Public Health Nurs. 1993 Jun;10(2):129-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.1993.tb00036.x.
6
Legal and ethical issues: questions and answers.法律与伦理问题:问答
J Sch Nurs. 2002 Oct;18(5):301-5. doi: 10.1177/10598405020180051001.
7
The Legal Doctrine on 'Limitation of Liability' in the Precedent Analysis on Plastic Surgery Medical Malpractice Lawsuits.整形手术医疗事故诉讼先例分析中的“责任限制”法律原则
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Dec;30(12):1718-22. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.12.1718. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
8
Legal Issues 101: Malpractice and Licensure Discipline.法律问题 101:医疗事故与执照纪律处分
NASN Sch Nurse. 2023 Nov;38(6):316-319. doi: 10.1177/1942602X231183940. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
9
Pure Psychiatric Injury Pursuant to the Civil Liability Legislation: An(other) Economic Perspective.根据民事责任立法的纯粹精神损伤:另一种经济视角
J Law Med. 2018 Apr;25(3):814-836.
10
Estate of Leach v. Shapiro.利奇遗产案诉夏皮罗
North East Rep Second Ser. 1984 May 2;469:1047-55.