Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Apr;236(4):1131-1143. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05245-9. Epub 2019 May 16.
There are no recent reports summarising the magnitude of prospective memory (PM) impairments in recreational drug users.
We performed a meta-analysis of studies (with a parallel group design) examining PM performance in users of common recreational drugs (including alcohol and tobacco) who were not intoxicated during testing. Studies were also evaluated for the presence of methodological bias.
Twenty-seven studies were included in the meta-analysis following literature searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO. Effect sizes (standardised mean difference; SMD) were calculated separately for the effects of alcohol, cannabis, ecstasy, methamphetamine and tobacco use. The influences of drug use and study characteristics on effect sizes were explored using meta-regressions. Sources of study bias were also assessed.
Heavy drinkers and regular drug users tended to perform worse than controls on event and time-based PM tasks. Effect sizes (standardised mean differences; SMDs) for event-based PM impairment across the different drug-using groups/heavy drinkers ranged between - 1.10 and - 0.49, with no 95% CI crossing 0.00. SMDs for time-based PM ranged between - 0.98 and - 0.70. Except for the CIs associated with the ES for smokers' time-based PM performance, no CIs crossed 0.00.
Although all drug-using groups showed moderate-large impairments in event and time-based PM, effect sizes had low precision and moderate-high levels of heterogeneity. In addition, several methodological and reporting issues were identified in the majority of studies. As such, considerable uncertainty remains regarding the role of confounds and the magnitude of PM impairments in non-intoxicated recreational drug users.
目前尚无文献汇总评估非醉酒状态下的 recreational drug users 前瞻性记忆(PM)损害的严重程度。
我们对评估常见 recreational drugs(包括酒精和烟草)使用者 PM 表现的研究(采用平行组设计)进行了荟萃分析,这些研究的受试者在测试期间未处于醉酒状态。还评估了这些研究的方法学偏倚。
通过对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 PsycINFO 进行文献检索,共纳入 27 项荟萃分析研究。分别计算酒精、大麻、摇头丸、冰毒和烟草使用对事件和基于时间的 PM 影响的效应量(标准化均数差;SMD)。使用荟萃回归探索药物使用和研究特征对效应量的影响。还评估了研究偏倚的来源。
重度饮酒者和经常吸毒者在事件和基于时间的 PM 任务上的表现往往比对照组差。不同吸毒组/重度饮酒者的事件性 PM 损害的效应量(SMD)范围为-1.10 至-0.49,95%CI 均未跨越 0.00。基于时间的 PM 的 SMD 范围为-0.98 至-0.70。除吸烟者基于时间的 PM 表现的 ES 相关 CI 外,没有其他 CI 跨越 0.00。
尽管所有吸毒组在事件和基于时间的 PM 上均表现出中度至重度损害,但效应量的精度低,异质性高。此外,在大多数研究中发现了一些方法学和报告问题。因此,对于非醉酒 recreational drug users 的混杂因素和 PM 损害程度,仍然存在很大的不确定性。