Tripp Erin A, Lendemer James C, McCain Christy M
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.
University of Colorado, Museum of Natural History, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.
Oecologia. 2019 Jun;190(2):445-457. doi: 10.1007/s00442-019-04413-0. Epub 2019 May 15.
The impacts of disturbance on biodiversity and distributions have been studied in many systems. Yet, comparatively less is known about how lichens-obligate symbiotic organisms-respond to disturbance. Successful establishment and development of lichens require a minimum of two compatible yet usually unrelated species to be present in an environment, suggesting disturbance might be particularly detrimental. To address this gap, we focused on lichens, which are obligate symbiotic organisms that function as hubs of trophic interactions. Our investigation was conducted in the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. We conducted complete biodiversity inventories of lichens (all growth forms, reproductive modes, substrates) across 47, 1-ha plots to test classic models of responses to disturbance (e.g., linear, unimodal). Disturbance was quantified in each plot using a standardized suite of habitat quality variables. We additionally quantified woody plant diversity, forest density, rock density, as well as environmental factors (elevation, temperature, precipitation, net primary productivity, slope, aspect) and analyzed their impacts on lichen biodiversity. Our analyses recovered a strong, positive, linear relationship between lichen biodiversity and habitat quality: lower levels of disturbance correlate to higher species diversity. With few exceptions, additional variables failed to significantly explain variation in diversity among plots for the 509 total lichen species, but we caution that total variation in some of these variables was limited in our study area. Strong, detrimental impacts of disturbance on lichen biodiversity raises concerns about conservation and land management practices that fail to incorporate complete estimates of biodiversity, especially from ecologically important organisms such as lichens.
干扰对生物多样性和分布的影响已在许多系统中得到研究。然而,对于地衣(专性共生生物)如何应对干扰,我们所知相对较少。地衣的成功建立和发展需要环境中至少存在两个兼容但通常不相关的物种,这表明干扰可能特别有害。为了填补这一空白,我们聚焦于地衣,它们是作为营养相互作用枢纽的专性共生生物。我们的调查在美国阿巴拉契亚山脉南部进行。我们在47个1公顷的样地中对地衣(所有生长形式、繁殖方式、基质)进行了完整的生物多样性清查,以测试对干扰的经典响应模型(例如线性、单峰)。使用一套标准化的栖息地质量变量对每个样地的干扰进行量化。我们还量化了木本植物多样性、森林密度、岩石密度以及环境因素(海拔、温度、降水、净初级生产力、坡度、坡向),并分析了它们对地衣生物多样性的影响。我们的分析发现地衣生物多样性与栖息地质量之间存在强烈的、正的线性关系:干扰程度越低,物种多样性越高。除了少数例外,对于总共509种地衣物种,其他变量未能显著解释样地间多样性的变化,但我们提醒,在我们的研究区域,其中一些变量的总变化是有限的。干扰对地衣生物多样性产生的强烈有害影响引发了人们对保护和土地管理实践的担忧,这些实践未能纳入对生物多样性的完整估计,尤其是来自地衣等具有生态重要性的生物的多样性估计。