Ullah Sami, Edrees Maha, Alhabtar Ahmad Mushabbab
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation Hospital, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2019 Apr-Jun;31(2):269-271.
Spasticity after spinal cord injury is a major problem that can limit the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs. Oral baclofen is more frequently used in treating spasticity than other antispasmodic agents due to its proven overall efficacy. Herein, we are reporting two SCI patients who reported unusual response to baclofen. Case 1 (28-year-old male) his injury was classified as T3 AIS-A. Case 2 (36-year-old male) his injury was classified as T4 AIS-A. Both cases reported worsening of spasms with the initiation of baclofen and the rapid improvement upon discontinuing the medication. The effect was dose-dependent as reported by both of our patients. Our impression is a rebound spasm secondary to baclofen as evident by the severity of spasm and spasticity that were directly proportional to the baclofen dose. Awareness of this reversible side effect is essential for its management. Moreover, it might provide a clue to understanding the mechanism of action of baclofen.
脊髓损伤后的痉挛是一个主要问题,它会限制康复计划的效果。由于已证实的总体疗效,口服巴氯芬比其他抗痉挛药物更常用于治疗痉挛。在此,我们报告两名脊髓损伤患者,他们对巴氯芬有异常反应。病例1(28岁男性),其损伤分类为T3 AIS-A。病例2(36岁男性),其损伤分类为T4 AIS-A。两名患者均报告在开始使用巴氯芬后痉挛加重,而在停药后迅速改善。正如我们的两名患者所报告的,这种效应是剂量依赖性的。我们的印象是巴氯芬继发的反弹性痉挛,痉挛和痉挛的严重程度与巴氯芬剂量成正比即可证明。认识到这种可逆的副作用对于其管理至关重要。此外,它可能为理解巴氯芬的作用机制提供线索。