From the Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital (A.J., D.N.W.) the Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto (A.J., D.N.W.) the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (A.J., P.C.A., D.N.W.) the Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (A.J.) the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital (D.N.W.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anesthesiology. 2019 Jul;131(1):84-93. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002701.
Days alive and out of hospital is a potentially useful patient-centered quality measure for perioperative care in adult surgical patients. However, there has been very limited prior validation of this endpoint with respect to its ability to capture differences in patient-level risk factor profiles and longer-term postoperative outcomes. The main objective of this study was assessment of the feasibility and validity of days alive and out of hospital as a patient-centered outcome for perioperative medicine.
The authors evaluated 540,072 adults undergoing 1 of 12 major elective noncardiac surgical procedures between 2006 to 2014. Primary outcome was days alive and out of hospital at 30 days, secondary outcomes were days alive and out of hospital at 90 days and 180 days. Unadjusted and risk-adjusted adjusted analyses were used to determine the association of days alive and out of hospital with patient-, surgery-, and hospital-level characteristics. Patients with days alive and out of hospital at 30 days values less than the tenth percentile were also classified as having poor days alive and out of hospital at 30 days. The authors then determined the association of poor days alive and out of hospital at 30 days with in-hospital complications, poor days alive and out of hospital at 90 days (less than the tenth percentile), and poor days alive and out of hospital at 180 days (less than the tenth percentile).
Overall median (interquartile range) days alive and out of hospital at 30, 90, and 180 days were 26 (24 to 27), 86 (84 to 87), and 176 (173 to 177) days, respectively. Median days alive and out of hospital at 30 days was highest for hysterectomy and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (27 days) and lowest for upper gastrointestinal surgery (22 days). Days alive and out of hospital at 30 days was associated with clinically sensible patient-level factors (comorbidities, advanced age, postoperative complications), but not measured hospital-level factors (academic status, bed size). Of patients with good days alive and out of hospital at 30 days, 477,163 of 486,087 (98%) and 470,093 of 486,087 (97%) remained within this group (greater than the tenth percentile) at days alive and out of hospital at 90 and 180 days.
Days alive and out of hospital is a feasibly measured patient-centered outcome that is associated with clinically sensible patient characteristics, surgical complexity, in-hospital complications, and longer-term outcomes. Days alive and out of hospital forms a novel patient-centered outcome for future clinical trials and observational studies for adult surgical patients.
对于接受择期非心脏手术的成年患者,存活且出院天数是一个潜在有用的以患者为中心的围手术期护理质量衡量指标。然而,对于该终点能否捕捉到患者个体风险因素特征和术后长期结局的差异,此前的验证非常有限。本研究的主要目的是评估存活且出院天数作为围手术期医学以患者为中心的结局的可行性和有效性。
作者评估了 2006 年至 2014 年间接受 12 种主要择期非心脏手术之一的 540072 名成年人。主要结局是 30 天时存活且出院天数,次要结局是 90 天时存活且出院天数和 180 天时存活且出院天数。使用未调整和风险调整分析来确定存活且出院天数与患者、手术和医院水平特征之间的关联。将 30 天时存活且出院天数值低于第十个百分位数的患者也归类为 30 天时存活且出院天数差。然后,作者确定 30 天时存活且出院天数差与住院并发症、90 天时存活且出院天数差(低于第十个百分位数)和 180 天时存活且出院天数差(低于第十个百分位数)之间的关联。
总体中位数(四分位距)30、90 和 180 天时存活且出院天数分别为 26(24 至 27)、86(84 至 87)和 176(173 至 177)天。子宫切除术和血管内主动脉瘤修复的 30 天时存活且出院天数最高(27 天),上消化道手术最低(22 天)。30 天时存活且出院天数与有临床意义的患者个体因素(合并症、高龄、术后并发症)相关,但与未测量的医院水平因素(学术地位、床位数)无关。在 30 天时存活且出院天数良好的患者中,486087 名患者中有 477163 名(98%)和 486087 名患者中有 470093 名(97%)在 90 天和 180 天的存活且出院天数时仍处于该组(大于第十个百分位数)。
存活且出院天数是一种可行的以患者为中心的测量指标,与有临床意义的患者特征、手术复杂性、住院并发症和长期结局相关。存活且出院天数为未来成人外科患者的临床试验和观察性研究提供了一个新的以患者为中心的结局。