• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胶质母细胞瘤患者围手术期癫痫发作与住院时间延长、再入院率增加和总生存时间降低有关。

Perioperative seizure in patients with glioma is associated with longer hospitalization, higher readmission, and decreased overall survival.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;125(4):1033-1041. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.JNS151956. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

DOI:10.3171/2015.10.JNS151956
PMID:26894454
Abstract

OBJECTIVE Seizures are among the most common perioperative complications in patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor resection and have been associated with increased disease progression and decreased survival. Little evidence exists regarding the relationship between postoperative seizures and hospital quality measures, including length of stay (LOS), disposition, and readmission. The authors sought to address these questions by analyzing a glioma population over 15 years. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was used to evaluate the outcomes of patients who experienced a postoperative seizure. Patients with glioma who underwent craniotomy for resection between 1998 and 2013 were enrolled in the institutional tumor registry. Basic data, including demographics and comorbidities, were recorded in addition to hospitalization details and complications. Seizures were diagnosed by clinical examination, observation, and electroencephalography. The Student t-test and chi-square test were used to analyze differences in the means between continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariate logistic and linear regression was used to compare multiple clinical variables against hospital quality metrics and survival figures, respectively. RESULTS In total, 342 patients with glioma underwent craniotomy for first-time resection. The mean age was 51.0 ± 17.3 years, 192 (56.1%) patients were male, and the median survival time for all grades was 15.4 months (range 6.2-24.0 months). High-grade glioma (Grade III or IV) was seen in 71.9% of patients. Perioperative antiepileptic drugs were administered to 88% of patients. Eighteen (5.3%) patients experienced a seizure within 14 days postoperatively, and 9 (50%) of these patients experienced first-time seizures. The mean time to the first postoperative seizure was 4.3 days (range 0-13 days). There was no significant association between tumor grade and the rate of perioperative seizure (Grade I, 0%; II, 7.0%; III, 6.1%; IV, 5.2%; p = 0.665). A single ictal episode occurred in 11 patients, while 3 patients experienced 2 seizures and 4 patients developed 3 or more seizures. Compared with their seizure-free counterparts, patients who experienced a perioperative seizure had an increased average hospital (6.8 vs 3.6 days, p = 0.032) and ICU LOS (5.4 vs 2.3 days; p < 0.041). Seventy-five percent of seizure-free patients were discharged home in comparison with 55.6% of seizure patients (p = 0.068). Patients with a postoperative seizure were significantly more likely to visit the emergency department within 90 days (44.4% vs 19.0%; OR 3.41 [95% CI 1.29-9.02], p = 0.009) and more likely to be readmitted within 90 days (50.0% vs 18.4%; OR 4.45 [95% CI 1.69-11.70], p = 0.001). In addition, seizure-free patients had a longer median overall survival (15.6 months [interquartile range 6.6-24.4 months] vs 3.0 months [interquartile range 1.0-25.0 months]; p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS Patients with perioperative seizures following glioma resection required longer hospital and ICU LOS, were readmitted at higher rates than seizure-free patients, and experienced shorter overall survival. Biological and clinical factors that predispose to the development of seizures after glioma surgery portend a worse outcome. Efforts to identify these factors and reduce the risk of postoperative seizure should remain a priority among neurosurgical oncologists.

摘要

目的

在接受脑肿瘤切除术的开颅手术患者中,癫痫发作是最常见的围手术期并发症之一,与疾病进展增加和生存率降低有关。关于术后癫痫发作与医院质量指标(包括住院时间、处置和再入院)之间的关系,几乎没有证据。作者试图通过分析超过 15 年的神经胶质瘤患者来解决这些问题。

方法

采用回顾性队列研究分析经历术后癫痫发作的患者的结局。纳入 1998 年至 2013 年间接受开颅切除术的神经胶质瘤患者进入机构肿瘤登记处。记录了基本数据,包括人口统计学和合并症,以及住院细节和并发症。通过临床检查、观察和脑电图诊断癫痫发作。学生 t 检验和卡方检验分别用于分析连续变量和分类变量之间的均值差异。多元逻辑回归和线性回归分别用于比较多个临床变量与医院质量指标和生存数据。

结果

共有 342 例神经胶质瘤患者首次接受开颅切除术。平均年龄为 51.0 ± 17.3 岁,192 例(56.1%)患者为男性,所有分级的中位生存时间为 15.4 个月(范围 6.2-24.0 个月)。高级别神经胶质瘤(III 级或 IV 级)占 71.9%的患者。88%的患者在围手术期使用了抗癫痫药物。18 例(5.3%)患者术后 14 天内出现癫痫发作,其中 9 例(50%)患者首次发作。首次术后癫痫发作的平均时间为 4.3 天(范围 0-13 天)。肿瘤分级与围手术期癫痫发作率之间无显著相关性(I 级:0%;II 级:7.0%;III 级:6.1%;IV 级:5.2%;p = 0.665)。11 例患者发生单次癫痫发作,3 例患者发生 2 次癫痫发作,4 例患者发生 3 次或更多癫痫发作。与无癫痫发作的患者相比,发生围手术期癫痫发作的患者平均住院时间(6.8 天比 3.6 天,p = 0.032)和 ICU 住院时间(5.4 天比 2.3 天;p < 0.041)更长。75%的无癫痫发作患者出院回家,而 55.6%的癫痫发作患者出院回家(p = 0.068)。术后发生癫痫发作的患者在 90 天内急诊就诊的可能性显著更高(44.4%比 19.0%;OR 3.41[95%CI 1.29-9.02],p = 0.009),90 天内再入院的可能性也显著更高(50.0%比 18.4%;OR 4.45[95%CI 1.69-11.70],p = 0.001)。此外,无癫痫发作的患者中位总生存期更长(15.6 个月[四分位距 6.6-24.4 个月]比 3.0 个月[四分位距 1.0-25.0 个月];p = 0.013)。

结论

接受神经胶质瘤切除术的患者术后发生癫痫发作,需要更长的住院和 ICU 住院时间,再入院率高于无癫痫发作的患者,总生存期更短。导致神经胶质瘤手术后发生癫痫发作的生物学和临床因素预示着预后更差。神经外科肿瘤学家应努力识别这些因素并降低术后癫痫发作的风险。

相似文献

1
Perioperative seizure in patients with glioma is associated with longer hospitalization, higher readmission, and decreased overall survival.胶质母细胞瘤患者围手术期癫痫发作与住院时间延长、再入院率增加和总生存时间降低有关。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;125(4):1033-1041. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.JNS151956. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
2
An extent of resection threshold for seizure freedom in patients with low-grade gliomas.低级别胶质瘤患者无癫痫发作的切除范围阈值。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;128(4):1084-1090. doi: 10.3171/2016.12.JNS161682. Epub 2017 May 26.
3
The Influence of Perioperative Seizure Prophylaxis on Seizure Rate and Hospital Quality Metrics Following Glioma Resection.围手术期癫痫预防对胶质瘤切除术后癫痫发生率及医院质量指标的影响。
Neurosurgery. 2017 Apr 1;80(4):563-570. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw106.
4
Seizure characteristics and control following resection in 332 patients with low-grade gliomas.332例低级别胶质瘤患者切除术后的癫痫发作特征及控制情况
J Neurosurg. 2008 Feb;108(2):227-35. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/108/2/0227.
5
Comparative analysis of monotherapy versus duotherapy antiseizure drug management for postoperative seizure control in patients undergoing an awake craniotomy.对比分析清醒开颅术后单药与双联抗癫痫药物治疗控制术后癫痫发作的效果。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1661-1667. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.JNS162913. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
6
Length of hospital stay after craniotomy for tumor: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.肿瘤开颅术后的住院时间:一项国家外科质量改进计划分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E12. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.FOCUS15386.
7
Extent of Resection and Residual Tumor Thresholds for Postoperative Total Seizure Freedom in Epileptic Adult Patients Harboring a Supratentorial Diffuse Low-Grade Glioma.幕上弥漫性低级别胶质瘤成年癫痫患者术后全面性无发作的切除范围和残余肿瘤阈值。
Neurosurgery. 2019 Aug 1;85(2):E332-E340. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy481.
8
Image-guided resection of high-grade glioma: patient selection factors and outcome.影像引导下高级别胶质瘤切除术:患者选择因素与结果
Neurosurg Focus. 2006 Apr 15;20(4):E16. doi: 10.3171/foc.2006.20.4.10.
9
Is there a risk of seizures in "preventive" awake surgery for incidental diffuse low-grade gliomas?对于偶然发现的弥漫性低级别胶质瘤进行“预防性”清醒手术时,是否存在癫痫发作的风险?
J Neurosurg. 2015 Jun;122(6):1397-405. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.JNS141396. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
10
A retrospective two-center study of antiepileptic prophylaxis in patients with surgically treated high-grade gliomas.一项回顾性的双中心研究,旨在探讨手术治疗高级别脑胶质瘤患者的抗癫痫预防治疗。
Neurol India. 2013 Mar-Apr;61(2):131-7. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.111118.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of monotherapy versus duotherapy with antiseizure medications for intraoperative and early postoperative seizure control in glioma patients undergoing awake craniotomy.对接受清醒开颅手术的胶质瘤患者,使用抗癫痫药物进行单药治疗与联合治疗以控制术中及术后早期癫痫发作的对比分析。
J Neurooncol. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1007/s11060-025-05133-7.
2
Automated feature learning and survival prognostication in grade 4 glioma using supervised machine learning models.使用监督式机器学习模型对四级胶质瘤进行自动特征学习和生存预后分析。
J Neurooncol. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s11060-025-05099-6.
3
Seizure risk factors and management approaches in patients with brain metastases.
脑转移瘤患者的癫痫发作风险因素及管理方法。
Neurooncol Pract. 2025 Jan 13;12(3):389-400. doi: 10.1093/nop/npaf001. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Hypoxia-Regulated CD44 and xCT Expression Contributes to Late Postoperative Epilepsy in Glioblastoma.缺氧调节的CD44和xCT表达促成胶质母细胞瘤术后晚期癫痫发作。
Biomedicines. 2025 Feb 5;13(2):372. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13020372.
5
A multi-center, open-label, randomized clinical trial evaluating the preventive effect of perampanel on craniotomy-induced epileptogenesis in seizure-naive patients with supratentorial brain tumors: study protocol for a GRAMPAS trial.一项多中心、开放标签、随机临床试验,评估吡仑帕奈对幕上脑肿瘤初发癫痫患者开颅术后癫痫发生的预防作用:GRAMPAS试验的研究方案
Trials. 2024 Dec 24;25(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08693-7.
6
Length of stay following elective craniotomy for tumor resection in children and young adults: a retrospective case series.儿童和青年成人择期开颅肿瘤切除术后的住院时间:一项回顾性病例系列研究。
J Neurooncol. 2025 Feb;171(3):651-658. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04887-w. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
7
Anti-Epileptic Drugs in Geriatric Neurosurgery: A Review of 669 Neurosurgical Cases.老年神经外科中的抗癫痫药物:669例神经外科病例回顾
J Epilepsy Res. 2022 Jun 30;12(1):27-32. doi: 10.14581/jer.22005. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Perioperative levetiracetam for seizure prophylaxis in seizure-naive brain tumor patients with focus on neurocognitive functioning.围手术期左乙拉西坦预防无癫痫发作脑肿瘤患者癫痫发作:关注神经认知功能。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Jul 8;22(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02762-7.
9
Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes for early postoperative seizures in dogs with rostrotentorial brain tumors after intracranial surgery.颅内手术后颅后窝脑肿瘤犬术后早期发作的发生率、风险因素和结局。
J Vet Intern Med. 2022 Mar;36(2):694-701. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16391. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
10
New-Onset Postoperative Seizures in Patients With Diffuse Gliomas: A Risk Assessment Analysis.弥漫性胶质瘤患者术后新发癫痫发作:一项风险评估分析。
Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 18;12:682535. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.682535. eCollection 2021.