Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hip Int. 2020 Sep;30(5):544-551. doi: 10.1177/1120700019849911. Epub 2019 May 17.
Intraoperative femoral fractures (IFF) during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) pose a major clinical challenge, and data on mid-term implant performance, functional outcome and patient satisfaction is limited.
50 patients who sustained IFFs during primary THA were retrospectively reviewed. A control group of patients who received a primary THA without complications was matched according to gender, age, body mass index and indication for THA. Both groups were followed-up for a minimum duration of 2 years. Average follow-up duration was 5.6 years (range 2-11.8 years) for the fracture group and 6 years (range 4.1-8.3 years) for the control group respectively. The following parameters were assessed and compared: stem revision, Harris Hip Score improvement, pain scale improvement, WOMAC, Tegner Score, UCLA, SF-36, forgotten joint score and patient satisfaction.
There were no stem revisions in the fracture group and 1 stem revision in the control group. Stem survival was 100% and 98.1% respectively ( = 0.447). The mean improvement in Harris hip score was 35.3 and 44.8 respectively. Significantly lower Harris Hip score improvement ( = 0.021) and patient satisfaction ( = 0.01) were observed in the fracture group. All other acquired parameters did not show significant differences.
Intraoperative fractures of the proximal femur are a relevant complication that does not lead to higher revision rates but might worsen the functional outcome and negatively impact patient satisfaction in mid-term follow-up even if treated appropriately.
初次全髋关节置换术中的股骨骨折(IFF)是一个主要的临床挑战,关于中期植入物性能、功能结果和患者满意度的数据有限。
回顾性分析了 50 例初次全髋关节置换术中发生 IFF 的患者。根据性别、年龄、体重指数和初次全髋关节置换术的适应证,对一组无并发症的初次全髋关节置换术患者进行了匹配对照。两组均随访至少 2 年。骨折组的平均随访时间为 5.6 年(范围 2-11.8 年),对照组为 6 年(范围 4.1-8.3 年)。评估并比较了以下参数:柄 Revision、Harris 髋关节评分改善、疼痛评分改善、WOMAC、Tegner 评分、UCLA、SF-36、遗忘关节评分和患者满意度。
骨折组无柄 Revision,对照组有 1 例柄 Revision。柄存活率分别为 100%和 98.1%( = 0.447)。Harris 髋关节评分的平均改善分别为 35.3 和 44.8。骨折组的 Harris 髋关节评分改善明显较低( = 0.021),患者满意度较低( = 0.01)。其他获得的参数均无显著差异。
股骨近端骨折是一种相关的并发症,它不会导致更高的翻修率,但即使得到适当的治疗,也可能会在中期随访中导致功能结果恶化,并对患者满意度产生负面影响。