• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国经静脉心脏起搏器的并发症及相关医疗费用。

Complications and associated healthcare costs of transvenous cardiac pacemakers in Germany.

机构信息

HGC GesundheitsConsult GmbH, Mörsenbroicher Weg 200, 40470 Duesseldorf, Germany.

Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Zentrum für Innere Medizin III Kardiologie, Auerbachstraße 110, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany.

出版信息

J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Jun;8(8):589-597. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0114. Epub 2019 May 17.

DOI:10.2217/cer-2018-0114
PMID:31099255
Abstract

This study evaluated the occurrence and associated costs of pacemaker complications in Germany from 2010 to 2013. Patients with a or replacement implantation of a single or dual chamber pacemaker between 2010 and 2013 were followed for 12 months post-implant using German health insurance claims data. A case-control analysis was performed using propensity score matching to estimate the costs of complications. Out of 12,922 implanted patients, 12.0% had a complication in the year following the implant. Complications related to lead and pocket were found in 10.2% of all implanted patients; infections occurred in 1.7% patients. Healthcare costs up to 36 months post complication were on average €4627 higher than for pacemaker patients without a complication. Pacemaker complications are common and represent a burden for patients and healthcare systems generating substantial costs. Most of the pacemaker complications involved the pacing lead or pacemaker pocket.

摘要

这项研究评估了 2010 年至 2013 年德国起搏器并发症的发生情况及其相关成本。使用德国健康保险索赔数据,对 2010 年至 2013 年间植入单腔或双腔起搏器的患者进行了 12 个月的随访。采用倾向评分匹配进行病例对照分析,以估算并发症的成本。在 12922 名植入患者中,有 12.0%在植入后的一年中出现并发症。所有植入患者中有 10.2%与导联和囊袋相关的并发症;1.7%的患者发生感染。与无并发症的起搏器患者相比,并发症发生后 36 个月内的医疗保健费用平均高出 4627 欧元。起搏器并发症很常见,给患者和医疗系统带来了负担,产生了大量成本。大多数起搏器并发症涉及起搏导联或起搏器囊袋。

相似文献

1
Complications and associated healthcare costs of transvenous cardiac pacemakers in Germany.德国经静脉心脏起搏器的并发症及相关医疗费用。
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Jun;8(8):589-597. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0114. Epub 2019 May 17.
2
Complications and Health Care Costs Associated With Transvenous Cardiac Pacemakers in a Nationwide Assessment.全国评估中经静脉心脏起搏器相关并发症和医疗保健费用。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Nov;3(11):1296-1305. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
3
Economic and health consequences of managing bradycardia with dual-chamber compared to single-chamber ventricular pacemakers in Italy.在意大利,与单腔心室起搏器相比,使用双腔起搏器治疗心动过缓的经济和健康后果。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008 Jan;9(1):43-50. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328013cd28.
4
Modelling the health benefits and economic implications of implanting dual-chamber vs. single-chamber ventricular pacemakers in the UK.模拟在英国植入双腔与单腔心室起搏器的健康益处及经济影响。
Europace. 2006 Jun;8(6):449-55. doi: 10.1093/europace/eul042. Epub 2006 May 11.
5
Pacemaker complications and costs: a nationwide economic study.起搏器并发症及费用:一项全国性经济研究。
J Med Econ. 2019 Nov;22(11):1171-1178. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1652186. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
6
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dual-chamber pacemakers compared with single-chamber pacemakers for bradycardia due to atrioventricular block or sick sinus syndrome: systematic review and economic evaluation.双腔起搏器与单腔起搏器治疗房室传导阻滞或病态窦房结综合征所致心动过缓的有效性和成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Nov;9(43):iii, xi-xiii, 1-246. doi: 10.3310/hta9430.
7
Early complications of permanent pacemaker implantation: no difference between dual and single chamber systems.永久性起搏器植入的早期并发症:双腔和单腔系统之间无差异。
Br Heart J. 1995 Jun;73(6):571-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.6.571.
8
Leadless Cardiac Pacemakers: Current status of a modern approach in pacing.无导线心脏起搏器:起搏的现代方法的现状。
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2017 Nov-Dec;58(6):403-410. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 18.
9
Infections and associated costs following cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantations: a nationwide cohort study.心血管植入式电子设备植入术后感染及相关费用:一项全国性队列研究。
Europace. 2018 Dec 1;20(12):1974-1980. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux387.
10
Incidence and costs of cardiac device infections: retrospective analysis using German health claims data.心脏设备感染的发病率及成本:利用德国医保数据进行的回顾性分析
J Comp Eff Res. 2018 May;7(5):483-492. doi: 10.2217/cer-2017-0080. Epub 2017 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Related to Implantable Electronic Cardiac Devices: An Ever-Constant Concern.与植入式电子心脏设备相关的成本效益:一直以来备受关注的问题。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024 Apr;121(4):e20240185. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240185.
2
Pain after pacemaker/ICD implants.起搏器/植入式心脏复律除颤器植入后的疼痛。
Br J Cardiol. 2022 Jul 19;29(3):24. doi: 10.5837/bjc.2022.024. eCollection 2022.
3
Effectiveness of Saireito, a Traditional Japanese Kampo Herbal Medication, on Pacemaker-Related Pleural Effusion: A Case Report.一种传统日本汉方药——清蒿琥脂对起搏器相关胸腔积液的疗效:一例报告。
Am J Case Rep. 2021 Aug 29;22:e931247. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.931247.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Leadless Pacemakers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.无导线起搏器的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 6;10(13):e019212. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019212. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
5
Prevention of cardiac implantable electronic device infections: guidelines and conventional prophylaxis.心脏植入式电子设备感染的预防:指南与传统预防措施
Europace. 2021 May 25;23(Suppl 4):iv11-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab071.