Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Cognition. 2019 Sep;190:165-169. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 20.
When making judgments (e.g., about the quality of job candidates) decision makers should ignore salient, but unrepresentative information (e.g., the person's name). However, research suggests that salient information influences judgments, possibly because memories of past encounters with similar information are integrated into the judgment. We studied eye movements to trace the link between the retrieval of past instances and their influence on judgments. Participants were more likely to look at screen locations where exemplars matching items on a name attribute had appeared, suggesting the retrieval of exemplars. Eye movements to exemplar locations predicted judgments, explaining why names influenced judgments. The results provide insights into how exemplars are integrated into the judgment process when assessing memory retrieval online.
当决策者做出判断(例如,对求职者质量的判断)时,他们应该忽略明显但非代表性的信息(例如,这个人的名字)。然而,研究表明,明显的信息会影响判断,这可能是因为对过去遇到类似信息的记忆被整合到了判断中。我们通过眼动追踪研究来追踪过去实例的检索与它们对判断的影响之间的联系。参与者更有可能看屏幕上出现与名字属性匹配的示例的位置,这表明了示例的检索。对示例位置的眼动预测了判断,解释了为什么名字会影响判断。研究结果为我们提供了一些深入的见解,了解了当在线评估记忆检索时,示例是如何被整合到判断过程中的。