Comparison of two pharmacological prophylaxis strategies for venous thromboembolism in spinal cord injury patients: a retrospective study.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost and incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding between two different VTE pharmacological prophylaxis strategies in individuals with spinal cord injury: one based on motor impairment (Protocol 1) and the other based on time from the lesion and presence of associated risk factors for VTE (Protocol 2).

SETTING

A tertiary rehabilitation hospital in Brazil.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a total of 1475 charts of individual admissions: 814 individuals received pharmacological prophylaxis according to Protocol 1 and 661 according to protocol 2. These cohorts were compared with respect to age, time and level of injury, length of stay, AIS classification, type of injury, and occurrence of VTE and major bleeding. The number of prescribed doses of enoxaparin and expenditures associated with enoxaparin during each period were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median lesion time was 3 years. The risk-based strategy drastically reduced the average monthly use of enoxaparin by 75% and the 12-month enoxaparin expenditure by $119,930.33, without increasing the risk of VTE. The incidence density of thromboembolic events was 0.55/10,000 patient-days, and all events occurred in individuals receiving prophylaxis according to Protocol 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Time from injury and risk of VTE-based protocol for indication of pharmacological prophylaxis drastically reduced costs. No difference in occurrence of VTE was observed.