Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, and the Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University, 676 N St Claire Street; Suite 600, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Mar;57(2):233-240. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00560-9. Epub 2019 May 17.
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by cryoballoon ablation (CBA) has emerged as a commonly used technique for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. We sought to explore the incidence, risk factors for, and characterization of post-CBA-PVI atrial flutter.
We analyzed a prospective registry of patients who underwent CBA-PVI at a single institution. We included patients with more than 3 months of follow-up data and excluded those with a history of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation. Locations of post-CBA-PVI atrial flutters were determined by analysis of intracardiac electrograms and electroanatomic maps.
There were 556 patients included in the analysis. The mean age was 61.0 ± 10.6 years, 67.4% were male, the number of failed anti-arrhythmic medication trials was 1.2 ± 0.8, and the duration of atrial fibrillation pre-CBA was 54.3 ± 69.1 months. The 28-mm second-generation cryoballoon was used almost exclusively. Over a median follow-up time of 22.7 ± 17.9 months, 25 (4.5%) patients developed post-CBA-PVI atrial flutter after the 3-month blanking period. Of those 25 patients, 15 (60%) underwent subsequent ablation to eliminate the atrial flutter circuit, with 60% being CTI-dependent and the remainder left-sided (p value not significant). Risk factors for the development of atrial flutter included NYHA class ≥ 2 (OR 5.02, p < 0.001), presence of baseline bundle branch block (OR 4.33, p = 0.006), and left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% (OR 3.36, p = 0.007).
The rate of post-CBA-PVI atrial flutter is low after the blanking period even with medium-term follow-up. The origin of atrial flutter is equally divided between the right and left atria.
冷冻球囊消融(CBA)肺静脉隔离(PVI)已成为治疗心房颤动的常用技术。我们旨在探讨 CBA-PVI 后房性心动过速的发生率、危险因素和特征。
我们分析了一家机构内接受 CBA-PVI 的前瞻性登记患者。我们纳入了随访时间超过 3 个月的患者,并排除了既往行三尖瓣峡部(CTI)消融术的患者。通过心内电图和电解剖图分析确定 CBA-PVI 后房性心动过速的部位。
共有 556 例患者纳入分析。平均年龄为 61.0±10.6 岁,67.4%为男性,抗心律失常药物治疗失败次数为 1.2±0.8,CBA 前心房颤动的持续时间为 54.3±69.1 个月。几乎全部使用第二代 28-mm 冷冻球囊。中位随访时间为 22.7±17.9 个月,3 个月空白期后 25(4.5%)例患者发生 CBA-PVI 后房性心动过速。这 25 例患者中,15(60%)例患者随后进行消融以消除房性心动过速环路,其中 60%为 CTI 依赖性,其余为左侧(p 值无统计学意义)。房性心动过速的发生危险因素包括 NYHA 分级≥2(OR 5.02,p<0.001)、基线束支传导阻滞(OR 4.33,p=0.006)和左心室射血分数<50%(OR 3.36,p=0.007)。
即使进行了中期随访,空白期后 CBA-PVI 后房性心动过速的发生率仍较低。房性心动过速的起源在右心房和左心房之间平分。