Cosío Francisco G
Getafe University Hospital, European University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2017 Jun;6(2):55-62. doi: 10.15420/aer.2017.5.2.
Clinical electrophysiology has made the traditional classification of rapid atrial rhythms into flutter and tachycardia of little clinical use. Electrophysiological studies have defined multiple mechanisms of tachycardia, both re-entrant and focal, with varying ECG morphologies and rates, authenticated by the results of catheter ablation of the focal triggers or critical isthmuses of re-entry circuits. In patients without a history of heart disease, cardiac surgery or catheter ablation, typical flutter ECG remains predictive of a right atrial re-entry circuit dependent on the inferior vena cava-tricuspid isthmus that can be very effectively treated by ablation, although late incidence of atrial fibrillation remains a problem. Secondary prevention, based on the treatment of associated atrial fibrillation risk factors, is emerging as a therapeutic option. In patients subjected to cardiac surgery or catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation or showing atypical ECG patterns, macro-re-entrant and focal tachycardia mechanisms can be very complex and electrophysiological studies are necessary to guide ablation treatment in poorly tolerated cases.
临床电生理学已使将快速房性心律失常传统分类为扑动和心动过速在临床上用处不大。电生理研究已明确了心动过速的多种机制,包括折返性和局灶性,其心电图形态和心率各异,通过对局灶触发灶或折返环路关键峡部进行导管消融的结果得以证实。在没有心脏病、心脏手术或导管消融病史的患者中,典型的扑动心电图仍可预测依赖下腔静脉 - 三尖瓣峡部的右房折返环路,该环路可通过消融得到非常有效的治疗,尽管房颤的晚期发生率仍是一个问题。基于对相关房颤危险因素的治疗的二级预防正在成为一种治疗选择。在因治疗房颤而接受心脏手术或导管消融的患者或显示非典型心电图模式的患者中,大折返和局灶性心动过速机制可能非常复杂,在耐受性差的病例中,电生理研究对于指导消融治疗是必要的。