Allen Caroline, Havlíček Jan, Williams Kate, Roberts S Craig
School of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Centre for Behaviour and Evolution, Newcastle University, UK; Division of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Department of Zoology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Physiol Behav. 2019 Oct 15;210:112541. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 15.
There is substantial evidence for assortative partner preferences in humans based on physical characteristics. In contrast, evidence suggests that olfactory preferences tend to be disassortative, with people preferring body odour of potential partners who are dissimilar at key genetic loci, perhaps to gain fitness advantage through offspring heterozygosity. We compared ratings of perceived body odour similarity of real couples with those of randomly paired 'fake' couples. Contrary to prediction, we find that odours of real partners are perceived more, rather than less, similar to each other than fake couples. However, this applied only to natural odour samples: there were no differences in similarity levels of real and fake couples' samples which were collected while wearing artificial fragrances. Furthermore, in light of suggestions that hormonal contraception (HC) disrupts disassortative odour preferences in women, we compared odour similarity among real couples in which the female partner was using or not using HC at the time when the relationship began. We find that odours of HC-using couples are of intermediate similarity between non-using and fake couples, suggesting that HC use during partner choice could affect odour-influenced assortment. We also examined the association between relationship satisfaction and perceived similarity of unfragranced odours of real couples. We found that these are positively correlated in male partners but negatively correlated in the female partners, indicative of a sex difference in the relative favourability of odour similarity in partner preference. Finally, by comparing odour similarity ratings with those given by perfumers using a novel olfactory lexicon we found evidence that similarity judgements were based on the Spicy/Animalic aspects of individual odour profiles. Taken together, our results challenge the conventional view that odour-mediated partner preferences in humans are typically disassortative.
有大量证据表明,人类基于身体特征存在择偶偏好。相比之下,有证据表明嗅觉偏好往往是异配的,人们更喜欢在关键基因位点上不同的潜在伴侣的体味,这可能是为了通过后代的杂合性获得健康优势。我们比较了真实情侣与随机配对的“假”情侣对彼此体味相似度的评分。与预测相反,我们发现真实伴侣的体味被认为比假情侣的体味彼此之间更相似,而不是更不相似。然而,这只适用于自然气味样本:在使用人工香料时收集的真实情侣和假情侣样本的相似度水平没有差异。此外,鉴于有观点认为激素避孕(HC)会扰乱女性的异配气味偏好,我们比较了女性伴侣在关系开始时使用或未使用HC的真实情侣之间的气味相似度。我们发现,使用HC的情侣的气味相似度介于未使用HC的情侣和假情侣之间,这表明在选择伴侣时使用HC可能会影响受气味影响的择偶。我们还研究了真实情侣无香料气味的感知相似度与关系满意度之间的关联。我们发现,这在男性伴侣中呈正相关,而在女性伴侣中呈负相关,这表明在伴侣偏好中,气味相似度的相对受欢迎程度存在性别差异。最后,通过使用一种新颖的嗅觉词汇表将气味相似度评分与调香师给出的评分进行比较,我们发现有证据表明相似度判断是基于个体气味特征的辛辣/动物性方面。综上所述,我们的结果挑战了传统观点,即人类中由气味介导的伴侣偏好通常是异配的。