Suppr超能文献

部分肾切除术治疗高复杂性肾肿瘤的管理:一项多中心分析。

Management of high complexity renal masses in partial nephrectomy: A multicenter analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Department of Urology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2019 Jul;37(7):437-444. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and efficacy of performing partial nephrectomy (PN) on patients with high nephrometry score tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used a prospectively maintained multi-institutional kidney cancer database to identify 144 patients with R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score ≥10 who underwent PN for a cT1-cT2 renal mass. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, tumor characteristics, perioperative, and pathological outcomes were analyzed and reported. Trifecta achievement, defined by warm ischemia time <25 minutes, no perioperative complications, and negative surgical margins, was the primary outcome. We assessed the relationship of baseline clinical and tumor characteristics data to trifecta achievement and perioperative complications.

RESULTS

Baseline median eGFR was 84.57 ml/min/1.73 m, with 119 (84.39%) patients having normal baseline kidney function. The median clinical tumor size was 4.95 cm, with 74 (51.75%) being completely endophytic and 58 (41.73%) located on the hilum. The median ischemia time was 20 minutes. Median estimated blood loss was 150 ml. Twelve patients (8.33%) had intraoperative complications. No patient had a conversion to open surgery. Postoperative, perioperative, and major complication rate were 10.42%, 17.3%, and 2.34% respectively. Thirty-six patients (37.89%) developed postoperative acute kidney injury and 28 (20.90%) developed new-onset CKD at a median follow-up of 6 months. Eight patients (5.56%) had a positive surgical margin. Trifecta was achieved in 89 (61.81%) patients. There was no significant difference in baseline, clinical, and tumor characteristics between those that achieved trifecta and in those where trifecta was not. Pathologic tumor stage was the only factor significantly associated with trifecta achievement (P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

In treating complex renal tumors, PN should be performed when possible. Although this remains a challenging procedure, with experience and appropriate case selection, the trifecta outcome can be achieved in a significant number of patients with high renal score lesions.

摘要

目的

确定对高肾评分肿瘤患者施行部分肾切除术(PN)的安全性和疗效。

患者与方法

我们使用前瞻性维护的多机构肾癌数据库,对 144 例 R.E.N.A.L. 肾肿瘤评分≥10 分的患者进行了 PN,这些患者的肾肿瘤为 cT1-cT2 期。分析并报告了基线人口统计学和临床特征、肿瘤特征、围手术期和病理结果。以手术时间<25 分钟、无围手术期并发症和阴性切缘为主要终点,确定 trifecta (无并发症、切缘阴性、热缺血时间<25 分钟)的实现情况。我们评估了基线临床和肿瘤特征数据与 trifecta 实现和围手术期并发症的关系。

结果

基线时中位 eGFR 为 84.57 ml/min/1.73 m,119 例(84.39%)患者的基线肾功能正常。中位临床肿瘤大小为 4.95 cm,74 例(51.75%)完全为内生型,58 例(41.73%)位于肾门处。中位缺血时间为 20 分钟,中位估计出血量为 150 ml。12 例(8.33%)患者术中发生并发症。无患者转为开放性手术。术后、围手术期和主要并发症发生率分别为 10.42%、17.3%和 2.34%。36 例(37.89%)患者术后发生急性肾损伤,28 例(20.90%)患者在中位随访 6 个月时新发 CKD。8 例(5.56%)患者切缘阳性。89 例(61.81%)患者达到 trifecta。达到 trifecta 和未达到 trifecta 的患者在基线、临床和肿瘤特征方面无显著差异。肿瘤病理分期是唯一与 trifecta 实现显著相关的因素(P=0.025)。

结论

在治疗复杂肾肿瘤时,应尽可能施行 PN。尽管这仍然是一项具有挑战性的手术,但随着经验的积累和适当的病例选择,在许多高肾评分病变患者中可以实现 trifecta 结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验