• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

75 岁以上患者部分肾切除术的 trifecta 结局:老年肾脏手术(RESURGE)组分析。

Trifecta Outcomes of Partial Nephrectomy in Patients Over 75 Years Old: Analysis of the REnal SURGery in Elderly (RESURGE) Group.

机构信息

Department ofUrology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Department of Urology Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

出版信息

Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Sep 15;6(5):982-990. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2019.02.010
PMID:30799289
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Partial nephrectomy (PN) in elderly patients is underutilized with concerns regarding risk of complications and potential for poor outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate quality and functional outcomes of PN in patients >75 yr using trifecta as a composite outcome of surgical quality.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter retrospective analysis of 653 patients aged >75 yr who underwent PN (REnal SURGery in Elderly [RESURGE] Group).

INTERVENTION

PN.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Primary outcome was achievement of trifecta (negative margin, no major [Clavien ≥3] urological complications, and ≥90% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] recovery). Secondary outcomes included chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage III and CKD upstaging. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was used to assess variables for achieving trifecta and functional outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (KMA) was used to calculate renal functional outcomes.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

We analyzed 653 patients (mean age 78.4 yr, median follow-up 33 mo; 382 open, 157 laparoscopic, and 114 robotic). Trifecta rate was 40.4% (n=264). Trifecta patients had less transfusion (p<0.001), lower intraoperative (5.3% vs 27%, p<0.001) and postoperative (25.4% vs 37.8%, p=0.001) complications, shorter hospital stay (p=0.045), and lower ΔeGFR (p <0.001). MVA for predictive factors for trifecta revealed decreasing RENAL nephrometry score (odds ratio [OR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.51, p=0.007) as being associated with increased likelihood to achieve trifecta. Achievement of trifecta was associated with decreased risk of CKD upstaging (OR 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.62, p<0.001). KMA showed that trifecta patients had improved 5-yr freedom from CKD stage 3 (93.5% vs 57.7%, p<0.001) and CKD upstaging (84.3% vs 8.2%, p<0.001). Limitations include retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

PN in elderly patients can be performed with acceptable quality outcomes. Trifecta was associated with decreased tumor complexity and improved functional preservation.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We looked at quality outcomes after partial nephrectomy in elderly patients. Acceptable quality outcomes were achieved, measured by a composite outcome called trifecta, whose achievement was associated with improved kidney functional preservation.

摘要

背景

老年患者的部分肾切除术(PN)的应用不足,这是因为人们担心会出现并发症风险和潜在的不良结果。

目的

使用 trifecta 作为手术质量的综合结果来评估 >75 岁患者行 PN 的质量和功能结果。

设计、地点和参与者:对 >75 岁行 PN 的 653 例患者(REnal SURGery in Elderly [RESURGE] 组)进行多中心回顾性分析。

干预措施

PN。

观察指标和统计分析

主要结局是达到 trifecta(阴性切缘、无主要(Clavien≥3)泌尿系统并发症和≥90%估计肾小球滤过率[eGFR]恢复)。次要结局包括慢性肾脏病(CKD)3 期和 CKD 升级。多变量分析(MVA)用于评估达到 trifecta 和功能结局的变量。Kaplan-Meier 生存分析(KMA)用于计算肾功能结局。

结果和局限性

我们分析了 653 例患者(平均年龄 78.4 岁,中位随访 33 个月;382 例开放手术,157 例腹腔镜手术,114 例机器人手术)。trifecta 率为 40.4%(n=264)。trifecta 患者的输血更少(p<0.001)、术中(5.3%比 27%,p<0.001)和术后(25.4%比 37.8%,p=0.001)并发症更少、住院时间更短(p=0.045)和 eGFR 下降更少(p<0.001)。MVA 分析表明,预测 trifecta 的因素是 RENAL 肾切除术评分降低(优势比[OR]1.26,95%置信区间 1.07-1.51,p=0.007),这与更有可能达到 trifecta 相关。达到 trifecta 与 CKD 升级风险降低相关(OR 0.47,95%置信区间 0.32-0.62,p<0.001)。KMA 显示,trifecta 患者 5 年时 CKD 3 期(93.5%比 57.7%,p<0.001)和 CKD 升级(84.3%比 8.2%,p<0.001)的无风险率更高。局限性包括回顾性设计。

结论

PN 可在老年患者中安全进行,且具有可接受的质量结果。trifecta 与肿瘤复杂性降低和功能保存改善相关。

患者总结

我们观察了老年患者部分肾切除术后的质量结局。我们使用 trifecta 这一综合结果来衡量质量,结果表明达到了可接受的质量水平,其达成与改善肾脏功能保存相关。

相似文献

1
Trifecta Outcomes of Partial Nephrectomy in Patients Over 75 Years Old: Analysis of the REnal SURGery in Elderly (RESURGE) Group.75 岁以上患者部分肾切除术的 trifecta 结局:老年肾脏手术(RESURGE)组分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Sep 15;6(5):982-990. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
2
Robotic partial nephrectomy for clinical T2a renal mass is associated with improved trifecta outcome compared to open partial nephrectomy: a single surgeon comparative analysis.机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗 T2a 期临床肾肿瘤与开放部分肾切除术相比,三重点结局改善:单外科医生的比较分析。
World J Urol. 2020 May;38(5):1113-1122. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02994-2. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
3
Management of high complexity renal masses in partial nephrectomy: A multicenter analysis.部分肾切除术治疗高复杂性肾肿瘤的管理:一项多中心分析。
Urol Oncol. 2019 Jul;37(7):437-444. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 16.
4
R-LESS partial nephrectomy trifecta outcome is inferior to multiport robotic partial nephrectomy: comparative analysis.R-LESS 部分肾切除术三联征结局劣于多通道机器人辅助部分肾切除术:比较分析。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):512-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.058. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
5
Outcomes of Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical T3a Renal Masses: A Multicenter Analysis.机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗临床 T3a 期肾肿瘤的结果:多中心分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Sep;7(5):1107-1114. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.10.011. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
6
Surgical quality, cancer control and functional preservation: introducing a novel trifecta for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.手术质量、癌症控制与功能保留:引入机器人辅助部分肾切除术的新型三连胜指标。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Feb;72(1):82-90. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03570-7. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
7
Trifecta and optimal perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in surgical treatment of small renal masses: a multi-institutional study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下肾部分切除术治疗小肾肿瘤的围手术期三连胜及最佳结局:一项多机构研究
BJU Int. 2015 Sep;116(3):407-14. doi: 10.1111/bju.12933. Epub 2015 May 5.
8
Head to Head Impact of Margin, Ischemia, Complications, Score Versus a Novel Trifecta Score on Oncologic and Functional Outcomes After Robotic-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Results of a Multicenter Series.机器人辅助部分肾切除术术后肿瘤学和功能结果的头对头影响:边缘、缺血、并发症、评分与新三联评分的比较:一项多中心系列研究结果。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Nov;7(6):1391-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.021. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
9
Assessing the Trade-off Between the Safety and Effectiveness of Off-clamp Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses with a High RENAL Score: A Propensity Score-matched Comparison of Perioperative and Functional Outcomes in a Multicenter Analysis.评估高 RENAL 评分的肾肿瘤无夹闭机器人部分肾切除术的安全性和有效性权衡:多中心分析中围手术期和功能结果的倾向评分匹配比较。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Nov;9(6):1037-1043. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.05.009. Epub 2023 May 30.
10
Robotic unclamped "minimal-margin" partial nephrectomy: ongoing refinement of the anatomic zero-ischemia concept.机器人无阻断“最小切缘”部分肾切除术:解剖零缺血概念的持续完善。
Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):705-12. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.044. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for localized renal masses in elderly and younger patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes.机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗老年和年轻患者的局限性肾肿块:围手术期结果的系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Urol. 2025 May 29;43(1):335. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05712-3.
2
Trifecta and pentafecta outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in a multi-institutional cohort of Indian patients.印度患者多机构队列中机器人辅助部分肾切除术后的三联和五联结局
Indian J Urol. 2023 Jan-Mar;39(1):39-45. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_238_22. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
3
Considering "Trifecta" as a Single Outcome when Comparing Robotic With Open Partial Nephrectomy: A Mathematical Model of Volume Conservation and Systematic Review.
考虑到机器人辅助与开放性部分肾切除术比较时“三联征”作为单一结果:一种体积守恒的数学模型和系统评价。
In Vivo. 2022 Nov-Dec;36(6):2558-2578. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12992.
4
Perioperative outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in elderly patients.老年患者机器人辅助部分肾切除术的围手术期结果。
World J Urol. 2022 Nov;40(11):2789-2798. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04171-4. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
5
Efficacy and feasibility of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for octogenarians: comparison with younger counterparts.机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗 80 岁以上患者的疗效和可行性:与年轻患者的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Oct;16(5):1165-1173. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01350-0. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
6
Postoperative outcomes of elderly patients undergoing partial nephrectomy.老年患者行部分肾切除术的术后结果。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 25;11(1):17201. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96676-y.
7
Trifecta achievement in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive factors.接受部分肾切除术患者的三连胜成就:预测因素的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Jul-Aug;48(4):625-636. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0095.
8
Comparison of functional outcomes of off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy access techniques: A preliminary report.无夹闭腹腔镜部分肾切除术入路技术的功能结局比较:初步报告。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Jan-Feb;47(1):103-111. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0734.