Suppr超能文献

一项培训干预对非交流性住院患者晚期痴呆疼痛评估量表(PAINAD)的影响

Impact of a Training Intervention on the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) Scale in Noncommunicative Inpatients.

作者信息

Muñoz-Narbona Lucia, Roldán-Merino Juan, Lluch-Canut Teresa, Juvé-Udina Eulàlia, Llorca Miquel Barberà, Cabrera-Jaime Sandra

机构信息

Institute for Health Science Research, Germans Trias I Pujol (IGTP), Department of Neurosciences, Barcelona, Spain; RETICS Research Group (Redes Temáticas de Investigación Cooperativa en Salud), Health Institute Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

Teaching Campus Sant Joan de Déu-Fundació Privada School of Nursing, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; GIES Research Group (Grupo de investigación en Enfermería, Educación y Sociedad), Barcelona, Spain; GEIMAC Research Group (Gruop Consolidad 2017-1681: Grupo de Estudios de Invarianza de los Instrumentos de Medida y Análisis del Cambio en los Ámbitos Social y de la Salud), Barcelona, Spain; GIRISAME Research Group (International Researchers Group of Mental Health Nursing Care), Madrid, Spain; REICESMA Research Group (Red Española Investigación de Enfermería en Cuidados de Salud Mental y Adicciones), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Pain Manag Nurs. 2019 Oct;20(5):468-474. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 May 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public hospitals in Catalonia (Spain) recommend using the Spanish version of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD-Sp) scale for assessing pain in adult patients unable to self-report. However, since its inclusion in Catalonian nursing care plans in 2010, there have been no training programs for nurses, contributing to its current underuse.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a nurse training intervention on the PAINAD-Sp scale in noncommunicative inpatients unable to self-report.

DESIGN

Before-after study.

SETTINGS

Two public hospitals in Catalonia (Spain).

PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS: Four hundred and one nurses participated in the training course and 219 patients received PAINAD-Sp assessments.

METHODS

We used a before-after study design, evaluating the use of the PAINAD-Sp scale over two 6-month periods before and after an online training intervention for nurses in February 2017, in two public hospitals. Data were collected from patient records in each center. The primary outcome was the number of patients receiving PAINAD-Sp assessments during admission. Secondary outcomes were the number of assessments undertaken per patient during admission, the total (0-10) and item-specific (0-2) PAINAD-Sp score, and pharmacologic treatment administered.

RESULTS

There were 401 nurses who took part in the training program. Over the study period, 219 patients received PAINAD-Sp assessments: 29 in the preintervention period and 190 in the postintervention period (p < .001). Administration of analgesics and antipyretics decreased (p < .001) after the intervention, whereas use of hypnotic drugs and sedatives increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Theoretical and practical training may be an effective way to improve nurses' approach to identifying, assessing, and managing pain in patients unable to self-report.

摘要

背景

西班牙加泰罗尼亚的公立医院建议使用西班牙文版的晚期痴呆疼痛评估量表(PAINAD-Sp)来评估无法自我报告的成年患者的疼痛情况。然而,自2010年该量表被纳入加泰罗尼亚护理计划以来,一直没有针对护士的培训项目,导致目前该量表使用不足。

目的

本研究旨在评估护士培训干预对无法自我报告的非沟通性住院患者使用PAINAD-Sp量表的影响。

设计

前后对照研究。

地点

西班牙加泰罗尼亚的两家公立医院。

参与者/受试者:401名护士参加了培训课程,219名患者接受了PAINAD-Sp评估。

方法

我们采用前后对照研究设计,在2017年2月对两家公立医院的护士进行在线培训干预前后的两个6个月期间,评估PAINAD-Sp量表的使用情况。数据从每个中心的患者记录中收集。主要结局是入院期间接受PAINAD-Sp评估的患者数量。次要结局是入院期间每位患者接受评估的次数、PAINAD-Sp总分(0-10分)和各项目得分(0-2分)以及给予的药物治疗。

结果

有401名护士参加了培训项目。在研究期间,219名患者接受了PAINAD-Sp评估:干预前期有29名,干预后期有190名(p <.001)。干预后,镇痛药和解热药的使用减少(p <.001),而催眠药和镇静剂的使用增加。

结论

理论和实践培训可能是改善护士识别、评估和管理无法自我报告患者疼痛方法的有效途径。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验