Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, PLA Medical School, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
J Endourol. 2019 Jul;33(7):557-563. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0159. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
The aim of this study was to explore a new treatment strategy for left renal vein tumor thrombus directed at the thrombus level and the therapeutic effect of robotic surgery. Fifteen patients with left renal cell carcinoma with renal vein tumor thrombus (Mayo level 0) who underwent robotic radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy from July 2013 to July 2017 were included in this series. If the left renal vein thrombus transcended the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), the thrombus was classified as level 0b, the patient was positioned right side up for thrombectomy and repositioned left side up for nephrectomy, and angioembolization of left renal artery was necessary; otherwise, the thrombus was classified as level 0a and the patient was positioned left side up for both nephrectomy and thrombectomy. Baseline, perioperative, and follow-up data were analyzed. Of all 15 patients, 10 had a level 0a tumor thrombus and 5 had a level 0b tumor thrombus. For level 0a patients, median operating time was 130 minutes, median estimated blood loss was 125 mL, with no patient receiving transfusion, and median hospital stay was 3.5 days. For level 0b patients, median operating time was 180 minutes, median estimated blood loss was 250 mL, with one patient receiving transfusion, and median hospital stay was 5 days. No perioperative complications or positive surgical margins occurred. For level 0a patients, one patient with preexisting lumbar vertebral metastasis died during a median follow-up of 39 months. For level 0b patients, all patients were alive at a median follow-up of 16.5 months. Our initial experience shows that the new treatment strategy for left renal vein tumor thrombus with the SMA as a dividing landmark directed at the thrombus level is safe and feasible. A larger cohort of level 0b patients and longer-term follow-up are needed to further assess the strategic advantages.
本研究旨在探讨一种针对血栓水平的左肾静脉肿瘤血栓新治疗策略,以及机器人手术的治疗效果。本研究纳入了 2013 年 7 月至 2017 年 7 月期间 15 例接受机器人根治性肾切除术和血栓切除术的左肾细胞癌伴肾静脉肿瘤血栓患者(Mayo 分级 0)。如果左肾静脉血栓跨越肠系膜上动脉(SMA),则将血栓分为 0b 级,患者行血栓切除术时取仰卧位,行肾切除术时取左侧卧位,且需要行左肾动脉血管栓塞术;否则,将血栓分为 0a 级,患者行肾切除术和血栓切除术时均取左侧卧位。分析了患者的基线、围手术期和随访数据。所有 15 例患者中,10 例为 0a 级肿瘤血栓,5 例为 0b 级肿瘤血栓。对于 0a 级患者,中位手术时间为 130 分钟,中位估计出血量为 125ml,无输血患者,中位住院时间为 3.5 天。对于 0b 级患者,中位手术时间为 180 分钟,中位估计出血量为 250ml,有 1 例患者输血,中位住院时间为 5 天。无围手术期并发症或阳性切缘。对于 0a 级患者,1 例存在腰椎转移的患者在中位随访 39 个月时死亡。对于 0b 级患者,所有患者在中位随访 16.5 个月时均存活。我们的初步经验表明,以 SMA 为界标的左肾静脉肿瘤血栓新治疗策略针对血栓水平是安全可行的。需要更大的 0b 级患者队列和更长的随访时间来进一步评估该策略的优势。