Luo Jin, Li Zhuoran, Liu Qiwei, Jia Yuqi, Li Jinqiao, Zhao Houming, Chen Zhiqiang, Dong Yujie, Zhang Xu, Ma Xin, Huang Qingbo, Peng Cheng, Wang Baojun
School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
School of Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Curr Urol. 2025 May;19(3):177-186. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000265. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
Renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus (RCC-IVCTT) has a high mortality rate, and surgery is the only promising treatment. Open surgery has been the gold standard treatment for several decades. However, with the development of minimally invasive surgical technologies, the advantages of robotic surgery have gradually emerged. The classic Mayo Clinic Classification system has certain limitations in guiding robotic surgery. Therefore, a new classification system that is compatible with robotic surgery is urgently needed. Advancements in robotic surgery must be systematically summarized and evaluated. Since Abaza's initial report on robotic surgery, the exploration of robotic radical nephrectomy (RRN) with IVC thrombectomy has resulted in numerous related techniques and approaches, including surgical positions and approaches, control of blood vessels, assisted exposure, step-by-step strategy, and preoperative and intraoperative auxiliary technology and equipment. Our team proposed a new tumor thrombus classification system termed the "301 Classification" based on RRN with venous thrombectomy, which matches each level of tumor thrombus with a distinct robotic surgical strategy. With advances in technology and accumulated experience, RRN with IVC thrombectomy holds promise as the preferred surgical option for RCC-IVCTT. Although "301 Classification" can provide objective advantages in robotic surgery, more cases are needed to be optimized for guiding surgery accurately. The overview provided in this paper aims to serve as a reference and inspiration for future research and clinical practice regarding RCC-IVCTT.
伴有下腔静脉(IVC)肿瘤血栓的肾细胞癌(RCC-IVCTT)死亡率很高,手术是唯一有前景的治疗方法。开放手术几十年来一直是金标准治疗方法。然而,随着微创外科技术的发展,机器人手术的优势逐渐显现。经典的梅奥诊所分类系统在指导机器人手术方面有一定局限性。因此,迫切需要一种与机器人手术兼容的新分类系统。必须系统地总结和评估机器人手术的进展。自从阿巴扎首次报道机器人手术后,探索机器人根治性肾切除术(RRN)联合IVC血栓切除术已经产生了许多相关技术和方法,包括手术体位和入路、血管控制、辅助暴露、分步策略以及术前和术中辅助技术与设备。我们的团队基于RRN联合静脉血栓切除术提出了一种新的肿瘤血栓分类系统,称为“301分类”,它将肿瘤血栓的每个级别与独特的机器人手术策略相匹配。随着技术进步和经验积累,RRN联合IVC血栓切除术有望成为RCC-IVCTT的首选手术方式。尽管“301分类”在机器人手术中能提供客观优势,但仍需要更多病例进行优化,以便更准确地指导手术。本文提供的综述旨在为未来关于RCC-IVCTT的研究和临床实践提供参考和启示。