Suppr超能文献

新生儿及3个月以下婴儿腹腔镜与开放胃造口术方法的比较

Comparison of the Laparoscopic and Open Methods of Gastrostomy at Neonates and Infants Up To Three Months of Age.

作者信息

Kozlov Yury, Novozhilov Vladimir, Kovalkov Konstantin, Rasputin Andrey, Baradieva Polina, Razumovsky Alexander

机构信息

1 Department of Neonatal Surgery, Municipal Pediatric Hospital, Irkutsk, Russia.

2 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Continuing Education (IGMAPO), Irkutsk, Russia.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Jul;29(7):958-964. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0106. Epub 2019 May 20.

Abstract

An open surgical intervention is a common approach for gastrostomy tube placement in neonates and infants. Also available, however less often used, is a laparoscopic technique for low-profile gastrostomy tube (button) placement. In this study we compare the pre-, intra-, and post-procedural outcomes of each technique. We retrospectively evaluated all open and laparoscopically inserted gastrostomies at our department from January 2002 to December 2016 and compared them in terms of operative parameters and outcomes. In the study interval, 44 open and 90 laparoscopically placed low-profile (button) gastrostomies were performed. There were no significant differences in gender distribution, mean age (42.54 versus 34.16 days), and mean weight (3311 versus 3476 g). The frequency of concomitant Nissen fundoplication was higher in the laparoscopy group (18% versus 47%;  < .05). The duration of G-tube placement by laparotomy was significantly longer (mean difference 16 minutes), than by laparoscopy, as were time periods between G-tube insertion and the onset of first feeding (mean differences 8.4 and 19.6 hours, respectively). Children in the laparoscopy group spent nearly 15 fewer days in the hospital than those who received a G-tube by laparotomy (29.0 versus 13.9;  < .05). Major complications were observed in 3 (6.82%) patients in the laparotomy group in the form of gastric content leak into the abdominal cavity and resulting peritonitis; complications were lower in the laparoscopy group (68.18% versus 13.33%;  = .03). Compared with open gastrostomy, the laparoscopic approach appears to be advantageous with respect to procedural duration, initiation of feedings, hospitalization duration, and rate of complications. Another difference was the frequency of concomitant Nissen fundoplication. Further prospective studies may determine the role of these patient-specific factors regarding who benefits most from the laparoscopic technique.

摘要

开放性手术干预是新生儿和婴儿胃造口管置入的常用方法。不过,也有一种用于置入低轮廓胃造口管(纽扣式)的腹腔镜技术,但使用频率较低。在本研究中,我们比较了每种技术在术前、术中和术后的结果。我们回顾性评估了2002年1月至2016年12月期间在我们科室进行的所有开放性和腹腔镜置入胃造口术,并在手术参数和结果方面进行了比较。在研究期间,共进行了44例开放性和90例腹腔镜置入低轮廓(纽扣式)胃造口术。两组在性别分布、平均年龄(42.54天对34.16天)和平均体重(3311克对3476克)方面无显著差异。腹腔镜组同时进行nissen胃底折叠术的频率更高(18%对47%;P<0.05)。开腹放置胃造口管的持续时间明显长于腹腔镜手术(平均差异16分钟),胃造口管插入与首次喂养开始之间的时间段也是如此(平均差异分别为8.4小时和19.6小时)。腹腔镜组儿童的住院天数比接受开腹胃造口管置入的儿童少近15天(29.0天对13.9天;P<0.05)。开腹组有3例(6.82%)患者出现主要并发症,表现为胃内容物漏入腹腔并导致腹膜炎;腹腔镜组并发症发生率较低(68.18%对13.33%;P=0.03)。与开放性胃造口术相比,腹腔镜手术在手术持续时间、喂养开始时间、住院时间和并发症发生率方面似乎具有优势。另一个差异是同时进行nissen胃底折叠术的频率。进一步的前瞻性研究可能会确定这些针对患者的因素对于哪些人最能从腹腔镜技术中获益所起的作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验