Departments of Surgery (Urology Service).
Epidemiology and Biostatistics.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2019 Aug;43(8):1061-1065. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001291.
In the eighth edition AJCC staging, all organ-confined disease is assigned pathologic stage T2, without subclassification. We investigated whether total tumor volume (TTV) and/or maximum tumor diameter (MTD) of the index lesion are useful in improving prediction of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in pT2 patients. We identified 1657 patients with digital tumor maps and quantification of TTV/MTD who had pT2 disease on radical prostatectomy (RP). Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess whether TTV and/or MTD are independent predictors of BCR when adjusting for a base model incorporating age, preoperative prostate-specific antigen, RP grade group, and surgical margin status. If either tumor quantification added significantly, we calculated and reported the c-index. Ninety-five patients experienced BCR after RP; median follow-up for patients without BCR was 5.7 years. The c-index was 0.737 for the base model. Although there was some evidence of an association between TTV and BCR (P=0.088), this did not meet conventional levels of statistical significance and only provided a limited increase in discrimination (0.743; c-index improvement: 0.006). MTD was not associated with BCR (P>0.9). In analyses excluding patients with grade group 1 on biopsy who would be less likely to undergo RP in contemporary practice (622 patients; 59 with BCR), TTV/MTD was not a statistically significant predictor (P=0.4 and 0.8, respectively). Without evidence that tumor quantitation, in the form of either TTV or MTD of the index lesion, is useful for the prediction of BCR in pT2 prostate cancer, we cannot recommend its routine reporting.
在第八版 AJCC 分期中,所有器官受限的疾病均被分配为病理分期 T2,不再进行细分。我们研究了肿瘤总体积(TTV)和/或最大肿瘤直径(MTD)是否有助于提高 pT2 患者生化复发(BCR)的预测能力。我们确定了 1657 名患者,他们在根治性前列腺切除术后(RP)有数字肿瘤图谱和 TTV/MTD 的定量分析,且患有 pT2 疾病。多变量 Cox 回归模型用于评估 TTV 和/或 MTD 是否为 BCR 的独立预测因子,同时调整包含年龄、术前前列腺特异性抗原、RP 分级组和手术切缘状态的基本模型。如果这两种肿瘤定量方法中有显著差异,则计算并报告 c 指数。95 名患者在 RP 后发生 BCR;无 BCR 的患者中位随访时间为 5.7 年。基本模型的 c 指数为 0.737。尽管 TTV 与 BCR 之间存在一定关联(P=0.088),但未达到常规统计学显著性水平,且仅提供了有限的区分度改善(0.743;c 指数提高:0.006)。MTD 与 BCR 无关(P>0.9)。在排除活检分级组 1 的患者(在当代实践中不太可能进行 RP)的分析中(622 名患者;59 名发生 BCR),TTV/MTD 不是统计学上显著的预测因子(分别为 P=0.4 和 0.8)。没有证据表明肿瘤定量(TTV 或 MTD)对预测 pT2 前列腺癌的 BCR 有用,因此我们不能推荐其常规报告。