• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后阳性手术切缘的范围和位置的生化复发风险。

Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

机构信息

Urology Department, CHU Lille, F-59000, Lille, France.

University of Lille, GIVRE - MERCS - Module for Education and Research Collaboration in Statistics, F-59000, Lille, France.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2018 Dec 27;18(1):1291. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5229-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-018-5229-1
PMID:30587172
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6307117/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are no published studies on the simultaneous effect of extent and location of positive surgical margins (PSMs) on biochemical recurrence (BCR) after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). The aim was to report the incidence, extent, and location of PSMs over the inclusion period as well as the rates of BCR and cancer-related mortality, and determine if BCR is associated with PSM extent and/or location.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 530 consecutive patients who underwent RALP between 2003 and 2012. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analyses and Cox regressions were performed to determine variables associated with BCR.

RESULTS

For the 530 operated patients, evaluated at a median of 92 months (IQR, 87-99), PSMs were observed in 156 (29%), of which 24% were focal. Out of 172 PSMs, 126 (73%) were focal and 46 (27%) were extensive. The KM survival using BCR as endpoint was 0.81 (CI, 0.78-0.85) at 5 years and was 0.67 (CI, 0.61-0.72) at 10 years; and using cancer-related mortality as endpoint was 0.99 (CI, 0.99-1.00) at 5 years and 0.95 (CI, 0.92-0.98) at 10 years. Multi-variable analysis revealed the strongest predictors of BCR to be Gleason score ≥ 8 (HR = 7.97; CI, 4.38-14.51) and 4 + 3 (HR = 3.88; CI, 2.12-7.07), lymph nodes invasion (HR = 3.42; CI, 1.70-6.91), pT stage 3b or 4 (HR = 3.07; CI, 1.93-4.90), and extensive apical PSMs (HR = 2.62; CI, 1.40-4.90) but not focal apical PSMs (HR = 0.86; CI, 0.49-1.50; p = 0.586).

CONCLUSION

Extensive apical PSMs significantly increased the risk of BCR, independently from pT stage, Gleason score and lymph nodes invasion, while focal apical PSMs had no significant effect on BCR.

摘要

背景

目前尚无研究报道机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)后阳性切缘(PSM)的范围和位置对生化复发(BCR)的同时影响。本研究旨在报告纳入期间 PSM 的发生率、范围和位置,以及 BCR 和癌症相关死亡率的发生率,并确定 BCR 是否与 PSM 的范围和/或位置有关。

方法

对 2003 年至 2012 年间接受 RALP 的 530 例连续患者进行回顾性分析。采用 Kaplan-Meier(KM)生存分析和 Cox 回归分析确定与 BCR 相关的变量。

结果

在中位随访 92 个月(IQR,87-99)的 530 例手术患者中,156 例(29%)出现 PSM,其中 24%为局灶性。在 172 个 PSM 中,126 个(73%)为局灶性,46 个(27%)为广泛性。以 BCR 为终点的 KM 生存分析显示,5 年时为 0.81(CI,0.78-0.85),10 年时为 0.67(CI,0.61-0.72);以癌症相关死亡率为终点的 KM 生存分析显示,5 年时为 0.99(CI,0.99-1.00),10 年时为 0.95(CI,0.92-0.98)。多变量分析显示,BCR 的最强预测因子为 Gleason 评分≥8(HR=7.97;CI,4.38-14.51)和 4+3(HR=3.88;CI,2.12-7.07)、淋巴结侵犯(HR=3.42;CI,1.70-6.91)、pT 期 3b 或 4(HR=3.07;CI,1.93-4.90)和广泛的尖部 PSM(HR=2.62;CI,1.40-4.90),但不是局灶性尖部 PSM(HR=0.86;CI,0.49-1.50;p=0.586)。

结论

广泛的尖部 PSM 显著增加了 BCR 的风险,与 pT 分期、Gleason 评分和淋巴结侵犯独立相关,而局灶性尖部 PSM 对 BCR 无显著影响。

相似文献

1
Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.基于机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后阳性手术切缘的范围和位置的生化复发风险。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Dec 27;18(1):1291. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5229-1.
2
Can robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) be performed very soon after biopsy?活检后不久就能进行机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RALP)吗?
World J Urol. 2017 Apr;35(4):605-612. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1893-4. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
3
Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.在高容量中心,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘阳性的线性范围对生化复发有影响。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):663-675. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01039-5. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
4
Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.根治性前列腺切除术与手术切缘阳性:与前列腺癌预后的关系。
Int Braz J Urol. 2014 May-Jun;40(3):306-15. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.03.03.
5
Predictive factors associated with biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy for pathological T2 prostate cancer with negative surgical margins.病理T2期前列腺癌且手术切缘阴性患者根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的相关预测因素。
Scand J Urol. 2017 Feb;51(1):20-26. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1263237. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
6
Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.阳性手术切缘部位影响根治性前列腺切除术后的生化复发。
BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1610-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08688.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
7
Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.在局限性前列腺癌中,根治性前列腺切除术标本中的三级Gleason分级模式与下一个更高Gleason评分组相比,预后更差。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Apr;36(4):158.e1-158.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
8
Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.保留Retzius间隙与标准机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术治疗临床局限性前列腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013641.pub2.
9
Small-volume lymph node involvement and biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术加扩大淋巴结清扫术后小体积淋巴结受累和生化复发的前列腺癌。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul;25(7):1398-1404. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01682-1. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
10
The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后,至少随访 5 年,阳性切缘的长度和位置对预测生化复发的影响。
BJU Int. 2015 Jan;115(1):106-13. doi: 10.1111/bju.12483.

引用本文的文献

1
Positive surgical margin and oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in different Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment risk groups.不同前列腺癌风险评估风险组中机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的手术切缘阳性与肿瘤学结局
BJU Int. 2025 Jul;136(1):135-142. doi: 10.1111/bju.16732. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
2
Can a nomogram predict apical prostate cancer pathology upgrade from fusion biopsy to final pathology? A multicenter study.是否可以通过融合活检到最终病理的Nomogram 预测前列腺癌的尖部升级?一项多中心研究。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jun;13(11):e7341. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7341.
3
Length of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: Does size matter? - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?经耻骨后、腹腔镜和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的比较:谁是赢家?
World J Urol. 2018 Apr;36(4):609-621. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2174-1. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
2
Correlation between postoperative prostate-specific antigen and biochemical recurrence in positive surgical margin patients: Single surgeon series.手术切缘阳性患者术后前列腺特异性抗原与生化复发的相关性:单术者系列研究
Prostate Int. 2017 Jun;5(2):53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
3
Factors affecting surgical margin positivity in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.
根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性长度:大小是否重要?——系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Dec;26(4):673-680. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00654-6. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
4
The association of a risk group with positive margin in the intraoperative and final pathology examination after robotic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后术中及最终病理检查中风险组与切缘阳性的相关性。
Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(4):491-495. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0031. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
5
Impact of positive surgical margin location and perineural invasion on biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性和神经周围侵犯对生化复发的影响。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug 13;18(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01977-7.
6
Correction to: Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.对《机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性范围和位置与生化复发风险》的更正
BMC Cancer. 2019 Feb 7;19(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5296-y.
影响机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中手术切缘阳性的因素。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2017 Mar 31;89(1):71-74. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2017.1.71.
4
Surgical method influences specimen margins and biochemical recurrence during radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术方法对高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术中标本边缘和生化复发的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2017 Oct;35(10):1481-1488. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2021-9. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
5
Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.微创根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线:肿瘤学结局的综合评估与累积求和分析
Urol Oncol. 2017 Apr;35(4):149.e1-149.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.10.015. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
6
The number of primary events per variable affects estimation of the subdistribution hazard competing risks model.每个变量的主要事件数量会影响竞争风险亚分布风险模型的估计。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;83:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.017. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
7
Implementation of a Surgeon-Level Comparative Quality Performance Review to Improve Positive Surgical Margin Rates during Radical Prostatectomy.实施外科医生层面的质量绩效比较评估,以改善根治性前列腺切除术的阳性切缘率。
J Urol. 2017 May;197(5):1245-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.102. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
8
Mid-term biochemical recurrence-free outcomes following robotic versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的中期生化复发无病生存结果。
J Robot Surg. 2011 Dec;5(4):251-7. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0266-7. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
9
Are you now a good surgeon? T2 positive margin status as a quality outcome measure following radical prostatectomy.你现在是一名优秀的外科医生吗?根治性前列腺切除术后切缘T2阳性状态作为一种质量结果指标。
World J Urol. 2017 Jan;35(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1836-0. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
10
The importance of surgical margins in prostate cancer.手术切缘在前列腺癌中的重要性。
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;113(3):310-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.24109. Epub 2016 Mar 23.