Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, No. 6 Changjiang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, China.
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019 May 20;10(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1238-5.
Controversial results still existed on the clinical utility of bone marrow-derived cells (BMCs) for cardiomyopathy (CMP). This study aims to reveal the true power of this promising approach by synthesizing all the available data on this subject matter.
Twenty studies including 1418 patients were identified from systematic search. Weighted mean differences for changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), 6-min walk distance, and NYHA functional class were estimated with a random-effects model. Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), rehospitalization, all-cause mortality, and patients' quality of life were also calculated.
Compared with the control group, BMC therapy resulted in greater LVEF (3.72%, 95% CI 2.31 to 5.13, P < 0.0001), 6-min walk distance (53.16, 95% CI 25.17 to 81.10, P = 0.0002), NYHA functional class (- 0.48, 95% CI - 0.65 to - 0.31, P < 0.0001), and smaller LVESV (- 16.79, 95% CI - 27.21 to - 6.38, P = 0.002). BMC treatment significantly reduced the mortality rate and improved patients' quality of life. No significant difference was found between the BMCs and control group in LVEDV, MACE, and rehospitalization rate. However, the outcomes showed a clear trend in favor of the BMC group. Subgroup analysis showed that LVEF improved greater in a subgroup of intracoronary infusion, BMSC, or higher cell dose.
The results of the current meta-analysis suggest that BMC treatment for CMP is safe and feasible. This therapy was associated with persistent improvements in LV function, LV remodeling, functional class, patients' survival, and quality of life. Intracoronary infusion of high-dose (> 10) BMSC might be a better therapeutic option for CMP patients. Further evidences are needed to verify our results.
骨髓来源细胞(BMCs)在心肌病(CMP)中的临床应用仍存在争议。本研究旨在通过综合该主题的所有可用数据,揭示这一有前途的方法的真正效果。
通过系统搜索,确定了 20 项研究,共纳入 1418 名患者。使用随机效应模型估计左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)、左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV)、6 分钟步行距离和纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级的变化的加权均数差。还计算了主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、再住院率、全因死亡率和患者生活质量。
与对照组相比,BMC 治疗可显著提高 LVEF(3.72%,95%CI 2.31 至 5.13,P<0.0001)、6 分钟步行距离(53.16,95%CI 25.17 至 81.10,P=0.0002)、NYHA 心功能分级(-0.48,95%CI -0.65 至 -0.31,P<0.0001),并降低 LVESV(-16.79,95%CI -27.21 至 -6.38,P=0.002)。BMC 治疗可显著降低死亡率并提高患者的生活质量。BMC 组与对照组在 LVEDV、MACE 和再住院率方面无显著差异。然而,结果显示出明显有利于 BMC 组的趋势。亚组分析表明,在冠状动脉内输注、BMSC 或更高细胞剂量亚组中,LVEF 改善更大。
目前的荟萃分析结果表明,BMC 治疗 CMP 是安全可行的。这种治疗方法与 LV 功能、LV 重构、心功能分级、患者生存和生活质量的持续改善相关。冠状动脉内输注高剂量(>10)BMSC 可能是 CMP 患者更好的治疗选择。需要进一步的证据来验证我们的结果。