Department of Radiation Oncology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Central do Exército do Rio de Janeiro (HCE-RJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Oral Oncol. 2019 Jun;93:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
To perform a systematic review of 1762 patients to comprehensively assess the benefit of altered-fractionation radiotherapy (ART) in early stage glottic carcinoma (ESGC).
Studies were identified in PubMed and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria were: (1) diagnosis of squamous cell ESGC (Tis, T1, T2); (2) ART versus conventionally-fractionationated radiotherapy (CRT); and (3) provision of number of local recurrence events and total numbers per fractionation arm. The random-effects model was fitted to estimate the pooled hazard ratio (HR). Subgroup sensitivity analyses were performed based on ART strategy (hypo- versus hyperfractionation), treatment-day reductions, machine type, tumor stage, and anterior commissure involvement.
Eleven studies met inclusion criteria: 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 7 two-arm retrospective studies. ART was associated with 38% fewer (HR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.46-0.82, p = 0.0009) and 60% fewer (HR 0.40; 95% CI: 0.24-0.66, p = 0.0003) local failure events in pooled analyses of the RCTs and retrospective studies, respectively. Both hyperfractionation (HR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.43-0.97, p = 0.03) and hypofractionation (HR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.33-0.91, p = 0.02) strategies were superior to CRT. The benefit persisted for all treatment- and tumor-related parameters, including anterior commissure involvement, with the exception of a pooled analysis of studies with predominantly T2 (<50% T1) cases (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.30-1.20, p = 0.15).
Both hypofractionation and hyperfractionation improve local control in ESGC, including T1 tumors and for anterior commissure involvement. However, this benefit may not persist for T2 tumors, for which alternative strategies should be considered.
对 1762 例患者进行系统回顾,全面评估改变分割放疗(ART)在早期声门型喉癌(ESGC)中的获益。
在 PubMed 和 EMBASE 中检索研究。纳入标准为:(1)诊断为鳞状细胞 ESGC(Tis、T1、T2);(2)ART 对比常规分割放疗(CRT);(3)提供每个分割臂的局部复发事件数和总数。采用随机效应模型估计合并危险比(HR)。根据 ART 策略(低分割与超分割)、治疗日减少、机器类型、肿瘤分期和前连合受累情况进行亚组敏感性分析。
11 项研究符合纳入标准:4 项随机对照试验(RCT)和 7 项双臂回顾性研究。ART 使局部失败事件减少 38%(HR 0.62;95%CI:0.46-0.82,p=0.0009)和 60%(HR 0.40;95%CI:0.24-0.66,p=0.0003),在 RCT 和回顾性研究的汇总分析中分别如此。超分割(HR 0.65;95%CI:0.43-0.97,p=0.03)和低分割(HR 0.55;95%CI:0.33-0.91,p=0.02)策略均优于 CRT。所有治疗和肿瘤相关参数的获益均持续存在,包括前连合受累,除了一项主要为 T2(<50% T1)病例的研究(HR 0.60,95%CI:0.30-1.20,p=0.15)的汇总分析之外。
低分割和超分割均可改善 ESGC 的局部控制,包括 T1 肿瘤和前连合受累。然而,对于 T2 肿瘤,这种获益可能无法持续,应考虑替代策略。