Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA.
Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, USA.
Oral Oncol. 2017 Sep;72:110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.07.013. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
Among patients with T2N0M0 glottic larynx cancer undergoing definitive radiotherapy, recent retrospective and prospective data have suggested improved outcomes with altered fractionation over conventional fractionation (CFxn). We sought to characterize national fractionation patterns and to compare outcomes among them.
We queried the National Cancer Database for T2N0M0 squamous cell carcinomas of the glottis diagnosed from 2004-2014 and managed with definitive radiotherapy. Dose-per-fraction and duration of radiotherapy were used to define cohorts undergoing CFxn, hypofractionation (HypoFxn), and hyperfractionation (HyperFxn). Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of receiving altered fractionation. Cox regression and propensity-score matching (PSM) analyses were used to compare survival between schedules.
We abstracted 2 006 CFxn patients, 1 166 HypoFxn patients, and 161 HyperFxn patients. Fractionation patterns changed significantly from 2004 to 2014, with use of HyperFxn decreasing from 6.3% to 1.8% and use of HypoFxn increasing from 23.9% to 54.1% (p<0.001). Receipt of altered fractionation was independently associated with later year of diagnosis and higher facility volume. On Cox regression, both HypoFxn (hazard ratio [HR] for mortality 0.84, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.73-0.97) and HyperFxn (HR 0.74, 95%CI 0.56-0.99) were associated with improved survival over CFxn. The survival advantage of each altered fractionation schedule over CFxn was redemonstrated on comparison of PSM groups.
Increasing utilization of HypoFxn for T2N0M0 glottic cancer is driving national practice patterns away from CFxn. Our findings support the use of altered fractionation, particularly HypoFxn, for patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy, although HyperFxn remains understudied in a prospective fashion.
在接受根治性放疗的 T2N0M0 声门型喉癌患者中,最近的回顾性和前瞻性数据表明,改变分割方式比常规分割(CFxn)可获得更好的结果。我们试图描述全国的分割方式,并对其结果进行比较。
我们从 2004 年至 2014 年在国家癌症数据库中查询了诊断为声门型鳞状细胞癌且接受根治性放疗的 T2N0M0 患者。我们使用单次剂量和放疗持续时间来定义接受 CFxn、HypoFxn 和 HyperFxn 的队列。使用逻辑回归来确定接受改变分割的预测因素。使用 Cox 回归和倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析来比较不同方案之间的生存率。
我们提取了 2006 例 CFxn 患者、1166 例 HypoFxn 患者和 161 例 HyperFxn 患者。从 2004 年到 2014 年,分割方式发生了显著变化,HyperFxn 的使用率从 6.3%降至 1.8%,HypoFxn 的使用率从 23.9%升至 54.1%(p<0.001)。改变分割的接受情况与诊断时间较晚和机构容量较高独立相关。在 Cox 回归中,HypoFxn(死亡率的危险比 [HR]为 0.84,95%置信区间 [95%CI]为 0.73-0.97)和 HyperFxn(HR 为 0.74,95%CI 为 0.56-0.99)与 CFxn 相比均与生存率提高相关。在 PSM 组的比较中,每种改变分割方案相对于 CFxn 的生存优势得以重现。
HypoFxn 治疗 T2N0M0 声门型癌症的应用增加正在使全国的治疗模式远离 CFxn。我们的研究结果支持对接受根治性放疗的患者使用改变分割方式,特别是 HypoFxn,尽管 HyperFxn 在前瞻性研究中仍研究不足。