CESP, INSERM, Faculté de médecine, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Biostatistics and Epidemiology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
BMJ Open. 2019 May 19;9(5):e025877. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025877.
The controversial results on the mifamurtide efficacy associated with chemotherapy, issued from the American INT-0133-study, in localised osteosarcomas, and the underpowered analysis performed separately in metastatic patients, should be clarified to homogenise international use of this promising drug. The European Commission has granted a marketing authorisation to mifamurtide combined with postoperative chemotherapy in localised osteosarcomas but not in metastatic patients, while the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has denied this authorisation.
Sarcome-13/OS2016 trial is a multicentre randomised open-label phase II trial evaluating the survival benefit of mifamurtide administered during 36 weeks in combination with postoperative chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, in patients >2 and ≤50 years with newly diagnosed high-risk localised or metastatic osteosarcoma. The main objective is to evaluate the impact on event-free survival (EFS) of mifamurtide on intention-to-treat population. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the impact of mifamurtide on overall survival, to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of the planned treatment, to correlate biology/immunology with the mifamurtide efficacy/toxicity. With a total of 126 enrolled patients and 51 events, the power is 80% if mifamurtide is associated with an 18% improvement of the 3-year EFS (52%vs70%, equivalent to an HR=0.55), with a one-sided logrank test alpha=10%. As relevant historical data are available (aggregate treatment effect from the INT-0133 trial and individual data from the control group of the Sarcome-09/OS2006 trial), a Bayesian analysis is also planned.
This study was approved by the 'Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France I' (12/06/2018), complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and French laws and regulations, and follows the International Conference on Harmonisation E6 Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. The trial results, even if they are inconclusive, as well as biological ancillary studies will be presented at appropriate international congresses and published in international peer-review journals.
EudraCT 2017-001165-24, NCT03643133.
美国 INT-0133 研究报告中提出的米伐木肽联合化疗治疗局部骨肉瘤的疗效存在争议,且对转移性患者的分析存在效力不足,这些结果需要进一步阐明,以便在国际范围内统一使用这种有前途的药物。欧洲委员会已批准米伐木肽联合术后化疗用于局部骨肉瘤,但不用于转移性患者,而美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)则拒绝了这一授权。
Sarcome-13/OS2016 试验是一项多中心、随机、开放标签的二期临床试验,评估了米伐木肽在 36 周内联合术后化疗与单独化疗在年龄>2 岁且≤50 岁的新诊断高危局部或转移性骨肉瘤患者中的生存获益。主要目的是评估意向治疗人群中米伐木肽对无事件生存(EFS)的影响。次要目的是评估米伐木肽对总生存的影响,评估计划治疗的可行性和毒性,以及将生物学/免疫学与米伐木肽的疗效/毒性相关联。该试验共纳入 126 名患者,发生 51 例事件,在米伐木肽可使 3 年 EFS 提高 18%(52%对 70%,相当于 HR=0.55)的假设下,具有 80%的效能(126 例患者中 51 例事件,双侧 logrank 检验,α=10%)。由于有相关的历史数据(INT-0133 试验的汇总治疗效果和 Sarcome-09/OS2006 试验对照组的个体数据),还计划进行贝叶斯分析。
该研究得到了“巴黎大区保护委员会 1 号”(12/06/2018)的批准,符合赫尔辛基宣言和法国法律法规,遵循国际协调会议 E6 良好临床实践指南。试验结果(即使是不确定的结果)以及生物学辅助研究将在适当的国际会议上报告,并发表在国际同行评议期刊上。
EudraCT 2017-001165-24,NCT03643133。