• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用电子健康数据制定系统性红斑狼疮的质量指标:一种改良的兰德适宜性方法。

The development of quality indicators for systemic lupus erythematosus using electronic health data: A modified RAND appropriateness method.

作者信息

Yajima Nobuyuki, Tsujimoto Yasushi, Fukuma Shingo, Sada Ken-Ei, Shimizu Sayaka, Niihata Kakuya, Takahashi Ryo, Asano Yoshihide, Azuma Teruhisa, Kameda Hideto, Kuwana Masataka, Kohsaka Hitoshi, Sugiura-Ogasawara Mayumi, Suzuki Katsuya, Takeuchi Tsutomu, Tanaka Yoshiya, Tamura Naoto, Matsui Toshihiro, Mimori Tsuneyo, Fukuhara Shunichi, Atsumi Tatsuya

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Mod Rheumatol. 2020 May;30(3):525-531. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2019.1621419. Epub 2019 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1080/14397595.2019.1621419
PMID:31111758
Abstract

Quality indicators (QIs) are tools that standardize evaluations in terms of the minimum acceptable quality of care, presumably contributing for the better management of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This study aimed to develop QIs for SLE using electronic health data. The modified RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used to develop the QIs. First, a literature review was conducted. Second, the candidate QI items that were available to be evaluated using the electronic health data were extracted. Third, the appropriateness of the items was assessed via rating rounds and panelists' discussions. We found 3621 articles in the initial search. Finally, 34 studies were reviewed, from which 17 potential indicators were extracted as candidate QIs. Twelve indicators were selected as the final QI set through the process of appropriateness. The median appropriateness of these 12 indicators was at least 7.5, and all of them were without disagreement. The QI included assessment of disease activity, treatment of SLE, drug toxicity monitoring, treatment of glucocorticoid complications, and assessment of SLE complications. We formulated 12 QIs for the assessment of patients with SLE based on electronic medical data. Our QI set would be a practical tool as a quality measure.

摘要

质量指标(QIs)是用于根据可接受的最低护理质量来规范评估的工具,可能有助于更好地管理系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者。本研究旨在利用电子健康数据制定SLE的质量指标。采用改良的兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校适宜性方法来制定质量指标。首先,进行文献综述。其次抽取可利用电子健康数据进行评估的候选质量指标项目。第三,通过评分轮次和专家小组讨论评估项目的适宜性。在初步检索中我们找到3621篇文章。最后,回顾了34项研究,从中提取出17项潜在指标作为候选质量指标。通过适宜性评估过程,12项指标被选为最终的质量指标集。这12项指标的适宜性中位数至少为7.5,且所有指标均无分歧。质量指标包括疾病活动度评估、SLE治疗、药物毒性监测、糖皮质激素并发症治疗以及SLE并发症评估。我们基于电子医疗数据制定了12项用于评估SLE患者的质量指标。我们的质量指标集将成为一种实用的质量衡量工具。

相似文献

1
The development of quality indicators for systemic lupus erythematosus using electronic health data: A modified RAND appropriateness method.利用电子健康数据制定系统性红斑狼疮的质量指标:一种改良的兰德适宜性方法。
Mod Rheumatol. 2020 May;30(3):525-531. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2019.1621419. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
2
Development of quality indicators for pregnancy and childbirth in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.系统性红斑狼疮患者妊娠和分娩相关质量指标的制定。
Mod Rheumatol. 2024 Oct 15;34(6):1170-1177. doi: 10.1093/mr/roae029.
3
Systematic review of the literature informing the systemic lupus erythematosus indicators project: reproductive health care quality indicators.系统性红斑狼疮指标项目文献的系统回顾:生殖健康护理质量指标。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Jan;63(1):17-30. doi: 10.1002/acr.20327.
4
A quality indicator set for systemic lupus erythematosus.一套针对系统性红斑狼疮的质量指标集。
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Mar 15;61(3):370-7. doi: 10.1002/art.24356.
5
Quality indicators for systemic lupus erythematosus based on the 2019 EULAR recommendations: development and initial validation in a cohort of 220 patients.基于 2019 年 EULAR 建议的系统性红斑狼疮质量指标:在 220 例患者队列中的制定和初步验证。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Sep;80(9):1175-1182. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220438. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
6
[Development of an indicator set for the evaluation of the quality of routine ambulatory health care for common disorders in children and adolescents].[儿童和青少年常见疾病常规门诊医疗质量评估指标集的制定]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 May;186:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2024.03.002. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
7
Association of clinic setting with quality indicator performance in systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional study.临床环境与系统性红斑狼疮质量指标表现的关联:一项横断面研究。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Jun 22;24(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02823-9.
8
Initial Benchmarking of the Quality of Medical Care in Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.儿童期起病的系统性红斑狼疮医疗质量的初步基准评估
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Feb;68(2):179-86. doi: 10.1002/acr.22666.
9
International consensus for provisions of quality-driven care in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.国际共识:保障儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮的高质量医疗服务。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Sep;65(9):1416-23. doi: 10.1002/acr.21998.
10
Quality indicators for inflammatory bowel disease: development of process and outcome measures.炎症性肠病质量指标:过程和结局测量指标的制定。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013 Mar;19(3):662-8. doi: 10.1097/mib.0b013e31828278a2.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations of retention in care by visits or lupus-specific labs with acute care among young adults: A medicare cohort study.青年成年人中通过就诊或狼疮特异性实验室检查进行的持续护理与急性护理的关联:一项医疗保险队列研究。
Lupus. 2025 Jul 18:9612033251360289. doi: 10.1177/09612033251360289.
2
Selecting home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) for Switzerland: A public health and healthcare providers' perspective.从公共卫生和医疗服务提供者的角度出发,基于瑞士居家护理居民评估工具(RAI-HC)选择居家护理质量指标
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 30;15(12):e0244577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244577. eCollection 2020.
3
Use of Quality Measures to Identify Disparities in Health Care for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
利用质量指标识别系统性红斑狼疮医疗保健中的差异。
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2020 Nov;46(4):623-638. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Sep 9.