Wressle Ewa, Törnvall Eva
Institutionen for samhalls-och valfardsstudier, Linkopings Universitet , Linköping, Sweden.
Management Department, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linkopings Universitet , Linköping, Sweden.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 May 13;32(4):752-764. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2018-0130.
Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a widely used approach in geriatric care and involves multidisciplinary assessments focused on determining a frail elderly person's medical, psychological and functional capability to develop an integrated plan for treatment. The purpose of this paper is to describe and scrutinize the CGA implementation process at six acute geriatric departments in three county councils and to study the outcome by the documentation in the patient medical records, and the staff perceptions using CGA.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The paper describes the implementation process stages. Outcome measures were based on patient medical records reviews at baseline and follow-ups at year 1 and year 2. Staff perceptions of using CGA were gathered by a questionnaire at the second follow-up.
The implementation had not yet reached sustainability so the implementation process must continue. Results show that documentation on the different areas increased in year 1, as well as the use of standardized assessment tools. However, results from the reviews for year 2 showed some decrease. Staff considered CGA to have high value for the geriatric patient but pointed out the need for continuing education.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Successful strategies for this implementation were strong support from the managers, small seminars, CGA rounds, good introduction routines for new staff and the use of reminders such as pocket-sized focus cards. A high staff turnover occurred during the study, which probably had a significant negative impact on the results.
综合老年评估(CGA)是老年护理中广泛使用的一种方法,涉及多学科评估,重点是确定体弱老年人的医疗、心理和功能能力,以制定综合治疗计划。本文的目的是描述和审视三个郡议会的六个急性老年科实施CGA的过程,并通过患者病历记录以及工作人员对使用CGA的看法来研究结果。
设计/方法/途径:本文描述了实施过程阶段。结果测量基于基线时以及第1年和第2年随访时对患者病历的审查。在第二次随访时通过问卷调查收集工作人员对使用CGA的看法。
实施尚未达到可持续性,因此实施过程必须继续。结果表明,不同领域的记录在第1年有所增加,标准化评估工具的使用也有所增加。然而,第2年审查的结果显示有所下降。工作人员认为CGA对老年患者具有很高的价值,但指出需要继续教育。
原创性/价值:此次实施的成功策略包括来自管理人员的大力支持、小型研讨会、CGA查房、针对新员工的良好入职流程以及使用袖珍聚焦卡等提醒工具。研究期间工作人员流动率很高,这可能对结果产生了重大负面影响。