Lund Brian C, Ohl Michael E, Hadlandsmyth Katherine, Mosher Hilary J
Center for Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA.
Veterans Rural Health Resource Center, Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA.
Mil Med. 2019 Dec 1;184(11-12):894-900. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz104.
Opioid prescribing is heterogenous across the US, where 3- to 5-fold variation has been observed across states or other geographical units. Residents of rural areas appear to be at greater risk for opioid misuse, mortality, and high-risk prescribing. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) provides a unique setting for examining regional and rural-urban differences in opioid prescribing, as a complement and contrast to extant literature. The objective of this study was to characterize regional variation in opioid prescribing across Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and examine differences between rural and urban veterans.
Following IRB approval, this retrospective observational study used national administrative VHA data from 2016 to assess regional variation and rural-urban differences in schedule II opioid prescribing. The primary measure of opioid prescribing volume was morphine milligram equivalents (MME) dispensed per capita. Secondary measures included incidence, prevalence of any use, and prevalence of long-term use.
Among 4,928,195 patients, national VHA per capita opioid utilization in 2016 was 1,038 MME. Utilization was lowest in the Northeast (894 MME), highest in the West (1,368 MME), and higher among rural (1,306 MME) than urban (988 MME) residents (p < 0.001). Most of the difference between rural and urban veterans (318 MME) was attributable to differences in long-term opioid use (312 MME), with similar rates of short-term use.
There is substantial regional and rural-urban variation in opioid prescribing in VHA. Rural veterans receive over 30% more opioids than their urban counterparts. Further research is needed to identify and address underlying causes of these differences, which could include access barriers for non-pharmacologic treatments for chronic pain.
美国各地的阿片类药物处方存在差异,在不同州或其他地理区域观察到了3至5倍的差异。农村地区居民似乎面临更高的阿片类药物滥用、死亡率和高风险处方风险。退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)为研究阿片类药物处方的地区和城乡差异提供了一个独特的环境,作为对现有文献的补充和对比。本研究的目的是描述退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)内阿片类药物处方的地区差异,并研究农村和城市退伍军人之间的差异。
经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准后,这项回顾性观察研究使用了2016年退伍军人健康管理局的全国行政数据,以评估II类阿片类药物处方的地区差异和城乡差异。阿片类药物处方量的主要衡量指标是人均吗啡毫克当量(MME)。次要指标包括发生率、任何使用情况的患病率以及长期使用的患病率。
在4928195名患者中,2016年退伍军人健康管理局全国人均阿片类药物使用率为1038 MME。使用率在东北部最低(894 MME),在西部最高(1368 MME),农村居民(1306 MME)高于城市居民(988 MME)(p < 0.001)。农村和城市退伍军人之间的大部分差异(318 MME)可归因于长期阿片类药物使用的差异(312 MME),短期使用率相似。
退伍军人健康管理局的阿片类药物处方存在显著的地区和城乡差异。农村退伍军人比城市退伍军人多接受30%以上的阿片类药物。需要进一步研究以确定并解决这些差异的根本原因,这可能包括慢性疼痛非药物治疗的获取障碍。