Suppr超能文献

英国初级保健中患有非癌性疼痛的患者的阿片类药物的时间趋势和处方模式:一项回顾性队列研究。

Time trends and prescribing patterns of opioid drugs in UK primary care patients with non-cancer pain: A retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Department of Rheumatology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 15;17(10):e1003270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003270. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The US opioid epidemic has led to similar concerns about prescribed opioids in the UK. In new users, initiation of or escalation to more potent and high dose opioids may contribute to long-term use. Additionally, physician prescribing behaviour has been described as a key driver of rising opioid prescriptions and long-term opioid use. No studies to our knowledge have investigated the extent to which regions, practices, and prescribers vary in opioid prescribing whilst accounting for case mix. This study sought to (i) describe prescribing trends between 2006 and 2017, (ii) evaluate the transition of opioid dose and potency in the first 2 years from initial prescription, (iii) quantify and identify risk factors for long-term opioid use, and (iv) quantify the variation of long-term use attributed to region, practice, and prescriber, accounting for case mix and chance variation.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

A retrospective cohort study using UK primary care electronic health records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink was performed. Adult patients without cancer with a new prescription of an opioid were included; 1,968,742 new users of opioids were identified. Mean age was 51 ± 19 years, and 57% were female. Codeine was the most commonly prescribed opioid, with use increasing 5-fold from 2006 to 2017, reaching 2,456 prescriptions/10,000 people/year. Morphine, buprenorphine, and oxycodone prescribing rates continued to rise steadily throughout the study period. Of those who started on high dose (120-199 morphine milligram equivalents [MME]/day) or very high dose opioids (≥200 MME/day), 10.3% and 18.7% remained in the same MME/day category or higher at 2 years, respectively. Following opioid initiation, 14.6% became long-term opioid users in the first year. In the fully adjusted model, the following were associated with the highest adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for long-term use: older age (≥75 years, aOR 4.59, 95% CI 4.48-4.70, p < 0.001; 65-74 years, aOR 3.77, 95% CI 3.68-3.85, p < 0.001, compared to <35 years), social deprivation (Townsend score quintile 5/most deprived, aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.52-1.59, p < 0.001, compared to quintile 1/least deprived), fibromyalgia (aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.49-2.19, p < 0.001), substance abuse (aOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.65-1.79, p < 0.001), suicide/self-harm (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.52-1.61, p < 0.001), rheumatological conditions (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.48-1.58, p < 0.001), gabapentinoid use (aOR 2.52, 95% CI 2.43-2.61, p < 0.001), and MME/day at initiation (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 1.07-1.08, p < 0.001). After adjustment for case mix, 3 of the 10 UK regions (North West [16%], Yorkshire and the Humber [15%], and South West [15%]), 103 practices (25.6%), and 540 prescribers (3.5%) had a higher proportion of patients with long-term use compared to the population average. This study was limited to patients prescribed opioids in primary care and does not include opioids available over the counter or prescribed in hospitals or drug treatment centres.

CONCLUSIONS

Of patients commencing opioids on very high MME/day (≥200), a high proportion stayed in the same category for a subsequent 2 years. Age, deprivation, prescribing factors, comorbidities such as fibromyalgia, rheumatological conditions, recent major surgery, and history of substance abuse, alcohol abuse, and self-harm/suicide were associated with long-term opioid use. Despite adjustment for case mix, variation across regions and especially practices and prescribers in high-risk prescribing was observed. Our findings support greater calls for action for reduction in practice and prescriber variation by promoting safe practice in opioid prescribing.

摘要

背景

美国阿片类药物泛滥导致英国对处方类阿片药物也产生了类似的担忧。在新使用者中,起始或升级为更有效和高剂量的阿片类药物可能会导致长期使用。此外,医生的处方行为被描述为导致阿片类药物处方和长期使用增加的关键驱动因素。据我们所知,没有研究调查在考虑病例组合的情况下,区域、实践和医生在阿片类药物处方方面的差异程度。本研究旨在:(i)描述 2006 年至 2017 年的处方趋势;(ii)评估初始处方后 2 年内阿片类药物剂量和效力的转变;(iii)量化并确定长期使用的风险因素;(iv)量化归因于区域、实践和医生的长期使用差异,同时考虑病例组合和机会变化。

方法和发现

本研究使用英国临床实践研究数据库中的初级保健电子健康记录进行了回顾性队列研究。纳入了新开始使用阿片类药物但没有癌症的成年患者;共确定了 1968742 名新的阿片类药物使用者。平均年龄为 51±19 岁,57%为女性。可待因是最常用的阿片类药物,2006 年至 2017 年的使用量增加了 5 倍,达到了 2456 张/10000 人/年。吗啡、丁丙诺啡和羟考酮的处方率在整个研究期间持续稳步上升。在开始使用高剂量(120-199 吗啡毫克当量[MME]/天)或超高剂量(≥200 MME/天)的患者中,分别有 10.3%和 18.7%在 2 年内仍处于相同的 MME/天或更高的类别。阿片类药物起始后,14.6%的患者在第一年成为长期阿片类药物使用者。在完全调整的模型中,以下因素与长期使用的最高调整比值比(aOR)相关:年龄较大(≥75 岁,aOR 4.59,95%CI 4.48-4.70,p<0.001;65-74 岁,aOR 3.77,95%CI 3.68-3.85,p<0.001,与<35 岁相比)、社会贫困程度(汤森德五分位 5/最贫困,aOR 1.56,95%CI 1.52-1.59,p<0.001,与五分位 1/最富裕相比)、纤维肌痛(aOR 1.81,95%CI 1.49-2.19,p<0.001)、物质滥用(aOR 1.72,95%CI 1.65-1.79,p<0.001)、自杀/自残(aOR 1.56,95%CI 1.52-1.61,p<0.001)、风湿性疾病(aOR 1.53,95%CI 1.48-1.58,p<0.001)、加巴喷丁类药物的使用(aOR 2.52,95%CI 2.43-2.61,p<0.001)以及起始时的 MME/天(aOR 1.08,95%CI 1.07-1.08,p<0.001)。在调整病例组合后,英国的 10 个地区中的 3 个(西北地区[16%]、约克郡和亨伯地区[15%]和西南地区[15%])、103 个实践(25.6%)和 540 个医生(3.5%)的长期使用比例高于人群平均水平。本研究仅限于在初级保健中开具阿片类药物的患者,不包括非处方或医院或药物治疗中心开具的阿片类药物。

结论

在开始使用超高 MME/天(≥200)的患者中,很大一部分患者在随后的 2 年内仍处于同一类别。年龄、贫困程度、处方因素、纤维肌痛等合并症、风湿性疾病、近期大手术以及物质滥用、酒精滥用和自杀/自残史与长期阿片类药物使用相关。尽管进行了病例组合调整,但仍观察到在高危处方方面,区域之间,尤其是实践和医生之间存在差异。我们的研究结果支持了更强烈的呼吁,即采取行动减少实践和医生的差异,促进安全的阿片类药物处方实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c2e/7561110/22d22e8ed387/pmed.1003270.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验