• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

限定动词形态复合词:社区样本中的数值。

The Finite Verb Morphology Composite: Values From a Community Sample.

机构信息

Callier Center for Communication Disorders, University of Texas at Dallas.

Reliant Rehabilitation, Plano, TX.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Jun 19;62(6):1813-1822. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0437. Epub 2019 May 20.

DOI:10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0437
PMID:31112435
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6808373/
Abstract

Purpose We investigated the finite verb morphology composite (FVMC), a measure associated with developmental language disorder (DLD), in a large community sample to provide evidence on its distribution, its association with other variables, and its sensitivity and specificity. Method We coded percent occurrence of FVMC morphemes in obligatory contexts in archival language samples from 676 six-year-olds conversing with an adult family member. Using multiple regression, we quantified the variance in FVMC scores accounted for by language sample characteristics (number of utterances and obligatory contexts) and child/family variables (performance IQ, family history, maternal education, and adult FVMC). We calculated sensitivity and specificity of low (< 85%) FVMC scores for predicting low (-1 SD) scores on measures of utterance length, receptive vocabulary, and nonword repetition. Results FVMC scores ranged from 33% to 100% ( M = 93%). Number of obligatory contexts ( R = 3%), performance IQ ( R = 11%), and adult FVMC ( R = 18%) were significant covariates. Sensitivity ranged from 25% to 35%; specificity was from 91% to 92%. Conclusion FVMC scores at the age of 6 years were generally high, but 12% of the participants had FVMCs below 85%, and scores were significantly associated with characteristics of the language samples, children, and adult interlocutors. Sensitivity of the FVMC was considerably lower in this community sample than in previous studies comparing groups of children who met criteria for DLD or typical language. Evidence from large representative samples is important when developing and validating potential clinical markers of DLD.

摘要

目的

我们研究了与发育性语言障碍(DLD)相关的有限动词形态复合(FVMC),旨在为其分布、与其他变量的关联以及其敏感性和特异性提供大量社区样本的证据。

方法

我们对 676 名与成年家庭成员交谈的 6 岁儿童的档案语言样本中的 FVMC 词素在强制性语境中的出现百分比进行了编码。使用多元回归,我们量化了语言样本特征(话语数量和强制性语境数量)和儿童/家庭变量(表现智商、家族史、母亲教育程度和成人 FVMC)对 FVMC 分数的方差的解释。我们计算了 FVMC 分数低于 85%的低分数(< -1 SD)预测话语长度、接受性词汇和非词重复等测量结果的低分数的敏感性和特异性。

结果

FVMC 分数范围为 33%-100%(M = 93%)。强制性语境数量( R = 3%)、表现智商( R = 11%)和成人 FVMC( R = 18%)是显著的协变量。敏感性范围为 25%-35%;特异性为 91%-92%。

结论

6 岁时的 FVMC 分数通常较高,但 12%的参与者的 FVMC 分数低于 85%,且分数与语言样本、儿童和成人对话者的特征显著相关。与之前比较符合 DLD 标准或典型语言的儿童组的研究相比,该社区样本中 FVMC 的敏感性要低得多。在开发和验证 DLD 的潜在临床标志物时,来自大型代表性样本的证据非常重要。

相似文献

1
The Finite Verb Morphology Composite: Values From a Community Sample.限定动词形态复合词:社区样本中的数值。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Jun 19;62(6):1813-1822. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0437. Epub 2019 May 20.
2
The diagnostic accuracy of two tense measures for identifying 3-year-olds with language impairment.两种紧张度测量方法对识别3岁语言障碍儿童的诊断准确性。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 May;23(2):203-12. doi: 10.1044/2013_AJSLP-13-0007.
3
The Effect of Sampling Context on Preschoolers' Finite Verb Morphology Composite Scores.采样语境对学前儿童有限动词形态复合分数的影响。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2024 Oct 16;55(4):1179-1187. doi: 10.1044/2024_LSHSS-23-00194. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
4
Finite Verb Morphology Composite Between Age 4 and Age 9 for the Edmonton Narrative Norms Instrument: Reference Data and Psychometric Properties.4 岁至 9 岁之间的埃德蒙顿叙事规范工具的有限动词形态复合:参考资料和心理测量特性。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Jan 8;51(1):128-143. doi: 10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-0028. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
5
A further look at two grammatical measures from children's language samples and their contribution to the diagnostic process.进一步观察儿童语言样本中的两个语法测量指标及其对诊断过程的贡献。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2024 Nov;38(11):1085-1097. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2024.2305120. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
6
Using Language Sample Analysis in Clinical Practice: Measures of Grammatical Accuracy for Identifying Language Impairment in Preschool and School-Aged Children.在临床实践中运用语言样本分析:用于识别学龄前和学龄儿童语言障碍的语法准确性测量方法
Semin Speech Lang. 2016 May;37(2):106-16. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1580740. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
7
Differentiating School-Aged Children With and Without Language Impairment Using Tense and Grammaticality Measures From a Narrative Task.利用叙事任务中的时态和语法性测量方法区分有语言障碍和无语言障碍的学龄儿童。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Apr 1;59(2):317-29. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-15-0066.
8
The Contribution of Socioeconomic Status to Children's Performance on Three Grammatical Measures in the Edmonton Narrative Norms Instrument.社会经济地位对埃德蒙顿叙事规范工具中三项语法测量儿童表现的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Jul 16;64(7):2776-2785. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00576. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
9
Development and evaluation of the Ingwavuma receptive vocabulary test: A tool for assessing receptive vocabulary in isiZulu-speaking preschool children.因格瓦武玛接受性词汇测试的发展与评估:一项用于评估以祖鲁语为母语的学龄前儿童接受性词汇能力的工具。
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2020 Nov 19;67(1):e1-e10. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v67i1.780.
10
Should We Stop Using Lexical Diversity Measures in Children's Language Sample Analysis?是否应该停止在儿童语言样本分析中使用词汇多样性测量?
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Jul 3;33(4):1986-2001. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00457. Epub 2024 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcription Decisions of Conjoined Independent Clauses Are Equitable Across Dialects but Impact Measurement Outcomes.并列独立分句的转录决策在各方言中是公平的,但会影响测量结果。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2024 Jul;55(3):870-883. doi: 10.1044/2024_LSHSS-23-00180. Epub 2024 May 17.
2
A further look at two grammatical measures from children's language samples and their contribution to the diagnostic process.进一步观察儿童语言样本中的两个语法测量指标及其对诊断过程的贡献。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2024 Nov;38(11):1085-1097. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2024.2305120. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
3
Contributions of early motor deficits in predicting language outcomes among preschoolers with developmental language disorder.早期运动缺陷对预测学龄前语言发育障碍儿童语言结局的贡献。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Aug;24(4):362-374. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2021.1998629. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
4
Tense Marking in the Kindergarten Population: Testing the Bimodal Distribution Hypothesis.幼儿园儿童的时态标记:检验双峰分布假说。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Feb 17;64(2):593-612. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00335. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
5
Marking of Tense and Agreement in Language Samples by Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment in African American English and Southern White English: Evaluation of Scoring Approaches and Cut Scores Across Structures.患有和未患有特定语言障碍的非裔美国儿童和美国南部白人儿童在语言样本中对时态和一致性的标记:跨结构的评分方法和临界分数评估
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Feb 17;64(2):491-509. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00243. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
6
Heritability of Specific Language Impairment and Nonspecific Language Impairment at Ages 4 and 6 Years Across Phenotypes of Speech, Language, and Nonverbal Cognition.特定语言障碍和非特定语言障碍在 4 岁和 6 岁时的遗传度,跨越言语、语言和非言语认知的表型。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Mar 23;63(3):793-813. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00012. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology.CATALISE 研究第二阶段:多国多学科德尔菲共识研究语言发育问题:术语。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;58(10):1068-1080. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12721. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
2
The impact of nonverbal ability on prevalence and clinical presentation of language disorder: evidence from a population study.非语言能力对语言障碍患病率及临床表现的影响:一项人群研究的证据
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;57(11):1247-1257. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12573. Epub 2016 May 16.
3
Differentiating School-Aged Children With and Without Language Impairment Using Tense and Grammaticality Measures From a Narrative Task.利用叙事任务中的时态和语法性测量方法区分有语言障碍和无语言障碍的学龄儿童。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Apr 1;59(2):317-29. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-15-0066.
4
The Effect of Base Rate on the Predictive Value of Brain Biomarkers.基础率对脑生物标志物预测价值的影响。
J Pain. 2016 Jun;17(6):637-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.01.476. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
5
Maternal Education Level Predicts Cognitive, Language, and Motor Outcome in Preterm Infants in the Second Year of Life.母亲教育水平可预测早产婴儿出生后第二年的认知、语言和运动发育结果。
Am J Perinatol. 2016 Jul;33(8):738-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1572532. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
6
The influence of base rates on correlations: An evaluation of proposed alternative effect sizes with real-world data.基础概率对相关性的影响:基于真实世界数据对提议的替代效应量的评估。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):1021-31. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0627-7.
7
Evaluation of three proposed markers for language impairment in English: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.评估三种针对英语语言障碍提出的标志物:诊断准确性研究的荟萃分析
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Dec;57(6):2261-73. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0189.
8
Specific language impairment: a convenient label for whom?特定语言障碍:对谁而言是个方便的标签?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Jul-Aug;49(4):416-51. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12102.
9
Identifying risk for specific language impairment with narrow and global measures of grammar.用狭义和广义语法测量方法识别特定语言障碍的风险。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2014 Oct;28(10):741-56. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2014.893372. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
10
The diagnostic accuracy of two tense measures for identifying 3-year-olds with language impairment.两种紧张度测量方法对识别3岁语言障碍儿童的诊断准确性。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 May;23(2):203-12. doi: 10.1044/2013_AJSLP-13-0007.