Caton C L, Gralnick A
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1987 Aug;38(8):858-63. doi: 10.1176/ps.38.8.858.
Recent emphasis on cutting the costs of psychiatric care and the possibility that reimbursement for psychiatric services will one day be based on diagnosis-related groups has stimulated debate about the proper length of psychiatric hospitalization. The authors review the literature on length of stay, focusing primarily on studies of the relationship between various patient and environmental variables and length of stay and studies comparing the outcomes of long and short hospitalizations. They conclude that diagnosis alone is not an accurate predictor of length of stay but may have predictive ability when combined with other data. Most studies found no differences in the outcomes of short and long hospitalizations. The authors identify numerous avenues for further research and are optimistic that a policy governing length of stay is within reach.
近期对降低精神科护理成本的重视以及精神科服务报销有朝一日可能基于诊断相关组这一可能性,引发了关于精神科住院合理时长的争论。作者回顾了关于住院时长的文献,主要关注各类患者及环境变量与住院时长之间关系的研究,以及比较短期和长期住院治疗效果的研究。他们得出结论,仅凭诊断并非住院时长的准确预测指标,但与其他数据结合时可能具有预测能力。大多数研究发现短期和长期住院治疗效果并无差异。作者指出了众多可供进一步研究的途径,并乐观地认为制定住院时长政策指日可待。