Suppr超能文献

使用依随时间表来测量雄性大鼠的冒险选择:安非他命、哌甲酯和甲基苯丙胺的影响。

Using a dependent schedule to measure risky choice in male rats: Effects of d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and methamphetamine.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Science, Northern Kentucky University.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville.

出版信息

Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Apr;28(2):181-195. doi: 10.1037/pha0000300. Epub 2019 May 23.

Abstract

Risky choice is the tendency to choose a large, uncertain reward over a small, certain reward, and is typically measured with probability discounting, in which the probability of obtaining the large reinforcer decreases across blocks of trials. One caveat to traditional procedures is that independent schedules are used, in which subjects can show exclusive preference for one alternative relative to the other. For example, some rats show exclusive preference for the small, certain reinforcer as soon as delivery of the large reinforcer becomes probabilistic. Therefore, determining if a drug increases risk aversion (i.e., decreases responding for the probabilistic alternative) is difficult (due to floor effects). The overall goal of this experiment was to use a concurrent-chains procedure that incorporated a dependent schedule during the initial link, thus preventing animals from showing exclusive preference for one alternative relative to the other. To determine how pharmacological manipulations alter performance in this task, male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 8) received injections of amphetamine (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 mg/kg), methylphenidate (0, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0 mg/kg), and methamphetamine (0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg/kg). Amphetamine (0.25 mg/kg) and methylphenidate (3.0 mg/kg) selectively increased risky choice, whereas higher doses of amphetamine (0.5 and 1.0 kg/mg) and each dose of methamphetamine impaired stimulus control (i.e., flattened the discounting function). These results show that dependent schedules can be used to measure risk-taking behavior and that psychostimulants promote suboptimal choice when this schedule is used. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

风险选择是指倾向于选择大的、不确定的奖励而不是小的、确定的奖励,通常用概率折扣来衡量,即在获得大奖励的概率在试验块中降低。传统程序的一个警告是,使用独立的时间表,在这种时间表中,相对于另一个,主体可以表现出对一个选择的唯一偏好。例如,一些老鼠一旦大奖励的传递变得不确定,就会立即对小的、确定的奖励表现出唯一的偏好。因此,确定一种药物是否会增加回避风险(即减少对概率性替代物的反应)是困难的(由于地板效应)。本实验的总体目标是使用一种包含依赖时间表的同时链程序,从而防止动物相对于另一个对一个选择表现出唯一偏好。为了确定药理学操作如何改变该任务中的表现,雄性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠(n = 8)接受了安非他命(0、0.25、0.5、1.0 mg/kg)、哌甲酯(0、0.3、1.0、3.0 mg/kg)和甲基苯丙胺(0、0.5、1.0、2.0 mg/kg)的注射。安非他命(0.25 mg/kg)和哌甲酯(3.0 mg/kg)选择性地增加了风险选择,而较高剂量的安非他命(0.5 和 1.0 mg/kg)和每个剂量的甲基苯丙胺损害了刺激控制(即,使折扣函数变平)。这些结果表明,依赖时间表可用于测量冒险行为,并且当使用这种时间表时,精神兴奋剂会促进次优选择。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Using a dependent schedule to measure risky choice in male rats: Effects of d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and methamphetamine.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Apr;28(2):181-195. doi: 10.1037/pha0000300. Epub 2019 May 23.
3
Methamphetamine increases risky choice in rats, but only when magnitude and probability of reinforcement are manipulated within a session.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2024 Jun;239:173751. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173751. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
4
5
Impulsive choice and environmental enrichment: effects of d-amphetamine and methylphenidate.
Behav Brain Res. 2008 Nov 3;193(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.04.019. Epub 2008 May 1.
6
One-trial behavioral sensitization in preweanling rats: differential effects of cocaine, methamphetamine, methylphenidate, and D-amphetamine.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Oct;217(4):559-71. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2316-2. Epub 2011 May 3.
9
10
Effects of amphetamine and methylphenidate on delay discounting in rats: interactions with order of delay presentation.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 Jan;231(1):85-95. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3209-3. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

2
Methamphetamine increases risky choice in rats, but only when magnitude and probability of reinforcement are manipulated within a session.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2024 Jun;239:173751. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173751. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
3
When Helping Is Risky: The Behavioral and Neurobiological Trade-off of Social and Risk Preferences.
Psychol Sci. 2021 Nov;32(11):1842-1855. doi: 10.1177/09567976211015942. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
4
Neuronal activity associated with cocaine preference: Effects of differential cocaine intake.
Neuropharmacology. 2021 Feb 15;184:108441. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108441. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
7
Examining the neurochemical underpinnings of animal models of risky choice: Methodological and analytic considerations.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019 Apr;27(2):178-201. doi: 10.1037/pha0000239. Epub 2018 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Cocaine-associated decision-making: Toward isolating preference.
Neuropharmacology. 2019 Jul 15;153:142-152. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2019.03.025. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
4
Buspirone maintenance does not alter the reinforcing, subjective, and cardiovascular effects of intranasal methamphetamine.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Dec 1;181:25-29. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.08.038. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
5
Spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats choose more impulsively than Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats on a delay discounting task.
Behav Brain Res. 2019 May 17;364:480-493. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.09.040. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
6
Prefrontal Dopamine D and D Receptors Regulate Dissociable Aspects of Decision Making via Distinct Ventral Striatal and Amygdalar Circuits.
J Neurosci. 2017 Jun 28;37(26):6200-6213. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0030-17.2017. Epub 2017 May 25.
7
Comparison of some behavioral effects of d- and l-methamphetamine in adult male rats.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Jul;234(14):2167-2176. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4623-8. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
8
9
Altered reward expectancy in individuals with recent methamphetamine dependence.
J Psychopharmacol. 2017 Jan;31(1):17-30. doi: 10.1177/0269881116668590. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
10
Effects of NMDA receptor antagonists on probability discounting depend on the order of probability presentation.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2016 Nov-Dec;150-151:31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验