Department of Clinical and Life Span Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2019 May 23;14(5):e0217382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217382. eCollection 2019.
Older adults have been found to focus more on positive and less on negative information compared to younger adults. Yet, results on this attentional positivity effect are inconsistent. Since personality has been related to attentional processing in younger adults, we explored whether (mal)adaptive personality traits are also linked to the occurrence of the positivity effect measured with eye tracking paradigms. We performed two studies with different experimental tasks and recruited for each study 60 community dwelling younger (aged 24-50) and 60 older (age 65-91) adults. We found some indication for a positivity effect with a free-viewing task (study 2), but not with a task measuring engagement and disengagement with emotional information (study 1). Although this effect should be interpreted with caution, it corroborates evidence that the positivity effect is more robust in situations without cognitive constraints. No evidence was found for personality traits to be related to the occurrence of the effect. Further research is needed to further clarify conditions that influence older adults' attention for emotional information.
与年轻人相比,老年人更关注积极信息,而较少关注消极信息。然而,关于这种注意力积极效应的结果并不一致。由于个性与年轻人的注意力加工有关,我们探讨了(适应不良的)人格特质是否也与使用眼动追踪范式测量的积极效应的发生有关。我们进行了两项具有不同实验任务的研究,为每项研究招募了 60 名社区居住的年轻人(年龄 24-50 岁)和 60 名老年人(年龄 65-91 岁)。我们在自由观察任务中发现了一些积极效应的迹象(研究 2),但在测量情感信息的参与和脱离的任务中没有发现(研究 1)。尽管应该谨慎解释这种效应,但它证实了在没有认知限制的情况下,积极效应更为稳健的证据。没有发现人格特质与效应的发生有关。需要进一步的研究来进一步澄清影响老年人对情绪信息注意力的条件。