Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Department of Health Services Research, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;221(5):474.e1-474.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.029. Epub 2019 May 22.
Although it is uncommon, the incidence of endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia among reproductive-aged women is increasing. The fertility outcomes in this population are not well described.
We aim to describe the patterns of care and fertility outcomes of reproductive-aged women with endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia.
A cohort of women aged ≤45 years with endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia diagnosed in 2000 to 2014 were identified in Truven Marketscan, an insurance claims database of commercially insured patients in the United States. Treatment information, including use of progestin therapy, hysterectomy, and assisted fertility services, was identified and collected using a combination of Common Procedural Terminology codes, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems codes, and National Drug Codes. Pregnancy events were identified from claims data using a similar technique. Patients were categorized as receiving progestin therapy alone, progestin therapy followed by hysterectomy, or standard surgical management with hysterectomy alone. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with receiving fertility-sparing treatment.
A total of 4007 reproductive-aged patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia were identified. The majority of these patients (n = 3189; 79.6%) received standard surgical management. Of the 818 patients treated initially with progestins, 397 (48.5%) subsequently underwent hysterectomy, whereas 421 (51.5%) did not. Patients treated with progestin therapy had a lower median age than those who received standard surgical management (median age, 36 vs 41 years; P < .001). The proportion of patients receiving progestin therapy increased significantly over the observation period, with 24.9% treated at least initially with progestin therapy in 2014 (P < .001). Multivariable analysis shows that younger age, a diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia diagnosis rather than endometrial cancer, and diagnosis later in the study period were all associated with a greater likelihood of receiving progestin therapy (P < .0001). Among the 421 patients who received progestin therapy alone, 92 patients (21.8%; 92/421) had 131 pregnancies, including 49 live births for a live birth rate of 11.6%. Among the 397 patients treated with progestin therapy followed by hysterectomy, 25 patients (6.3%; 25/397) had 34 pregnancies with 13 live births. The median age of patients who experienced a live birth following diagnosis during the study period was 36 years (interquartile range, 33-38). The use of some form of assisted fertility services was observed in 15.5% patients who were treated with progestin therapy. Among patients who experienced any pregnancy event following diagnosis, 54% of patients used some form of fertility treatment. For patients who experienced a live birth following diagnosis, 50% of patients received fertility treatment. Median time to live birth following diagnosis was 756 days (interquartile range, 525-1077). Patients treated with progestin therapy were more likely to experience a live birth if they had used assisted fertility services (odds ratio, 5.9; 95% confidence interval, 3.4-10.1; P < .0001).
The number of patients who received fertility-sparing treatment for endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia increased over time. However, the proportion of women who experience a live birth following these diagnoses is relatively small.
尽管罕见,但生殖年龄女性的子宫内膜癌和非典型增生发病率正在上升。该人群的生育结局尚未得到充分描述。
我们旨在描述生殖年龄患有子宫内膜癌或非典型增生女性的治疗模式和生育结局。
在 Truven Marketscan(美国商业保险患者的保险索赔数据库)中,确定了 2000 年至 2014 年间诊断为≤45 岁的子宫内膜癌或非典型增生的女性队列。使用通用程序术语代码、国际疾病分类和相关健康问题代码以及国家药物代码的组合来识别和收集治疗信息,包括孕激素治疗、子宫切除术和辅助生育服务的使用。使用类似的技术从索赔数据中识别妊娠事件。将患者分为单独接受孕激素治疗、孕激素治疗后行子宫切除术或单独行标准手术管理(行子宫切除术)的患者。采用多变量逻辑回归评估与接受生育保护治疗相关的因素。
共确定了 4007 例诊断为子宫内膜癌或非典型增生的生殖年龄患者。这些患者中的大多数(n=3189;79.6%)接受了标准手术治疗。在最初接受孕激素治疗的 818 例患者中,397 例(48.5%)随后行子宫切除术,而 421 例(51.5%)未行子宫切除术。接受孕激素治疗的患者中位年龄低于接受标准手术治疗的患者(中位年龄,36 岁比 41 岁;P<0.001)。在整个观察期间,接受孕激素治疗的患者比例显著增加,2014 年至少最初接受孕激素治疗的患者比例为 24.9%(P<0.001)。多变量分析显示,年龄较小、诊断为非典型增生而不是子宫内膜癌,以及研究期间较晚的诊断均与接受孕激素治疗的可能性更大相关(P<0.0001)。在单独接受孕激素治疗的 421 例患者中,92 例(21.8%;92/421)有 131 次妊娠,包括 49 例活产,活产率为 11.6%。在接受孕激素治疗后行子宫切除术的 397 例患者中,25 例(6.3%;25/397)有 34 次妊娠,其中 13 例活产。在研究期间诊断后经历活产的患者中位年龄为 36 岁(四分位距,33-38)。在接受孕激素治疗的患者中,观察到 15.5%的患者使用了某种形式的辅助生育服务。在诊断后经历任何妊娠事件的患者中,54%的患者使用了某种形式的生育治疗。在诊断后经历活产的患者中,50%的患者接受了生育治疗。诊断后活产的中位时间为 756 天(四分位距,525-1077)。接受孕激素治疗的患者如果使用辅助生育服务,更有可能经历活产(优势比,5.9;95%置信区间,3.4-10.1;P<0.0001)。
接受子宫内膜癌或非典型增生生育保护治疗的患者数量随时间增加。然而,这些诊断后经历活产的女性比例相对较小。