Department of Surgery, Ito Hospital, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Ito Hospital, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Surgery. 2019 Sep;166(3):342-348. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 May 22.
BACKGROUND: Although lobectomy is considered acceptable as a primary surgical treatment for papillary thyroid carcinoma in properly selected patients, a standard treatment for postlobectomy lymph node recurrence has not been established. Here we compared the effectiveness of therapy with lymphadenectomy alone to that of treatment with completion thyroidectomy and lymphadenectomy followed by radioactive iodine. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma who underwent surgery for lymph node recurrence in the period from January 2003 to December 2008, all of whom had previously undergone initial lobectomy with or without lymph node dissection. One-hundred and twenty-five patients were included in the primary analysis. RESULTS: Ninety-eight of these patients underwent lymphadenectomy alone (L group), and 27 received lymphadenectomy and completion thyroidectomy followed by radioactive iodine (LC&R group). The median follow-up time was 10.2 years. The overall survival, distant relapse-free survival, and lymph node relapse-free survival were not significantly different between the LC&R and L groups (P = .89, 0.58, and .22, respectively), whereas the LC&R group patients had significantly longer operation time, higher blood loss, and a higher rate of postoperative hypoparathyroidism compared with the L group (P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared with completion thyroidectomy and lymphadenectomy followed by radioactive iodine, lymphadenectomy alone was considered an acceptable therapeutic option which decreased the surgical disadvantages but did not decrease survival for at least 10 years after recurrence surgery for PTC patients with only lymph node recurrence.
背景:虽然对于选择恰当的患者来说,肺叶切除术被认为是一种可行的甲状腺乳头状癌的主要治疗方法,但对于术后淋巴结复发的标准治疗方法尚未确定。在这里,我们比较了单纯淋巴结清扫术与甲状腺全切除和淋巴结清扫术后放射性碘治疗的疗效。
方法:这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2003 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月期间因淋巴结复发而接受手术治疗的甲状腺乳头状癌患者,所有患者均在先前接受过初始的肺叶切除术或肺叶切除术加淋巴结清扫术。主要分析纳入了 125 例患者。
结果:其中 98 例患者接受了单纯淋巴结清扫术(L 组),27 例患者接受了淋巴结清扫术和甲状腺全切除及放射性碘治疗(LC&R 组)。中位随访时间为 10.2 年。LC&R 组和 L 组的总生存、远处无复发生存和淋巴结无复发生存均无显著差异(P=0.89、0.58 和 0.22),但 LC&R 组患者的手术时间、出血量和术后甲状旁腺功能减退症的发生率均显著高于 L 组(P<0.001)。
结论:与甲状腺全切除和淋巴结清扫术后放射性碘治疗相比,对于仅有淋巴结复发的 PTC 患者,单纯淋巴结清扫术是一种可接受的治疗选择,降低了手术风险,但在复发后 10 年内不会降低生存率。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025-2-1