Fernández-Tomé B, Díaz-Güemes I, Enciso Sanz S, Moreno Naranjo B, Correa L, Sánchez-Hurtado M A, Usón J, Bachiller J, Serrano A, Sánchez-Margallo F M
Unidad de Laparoscopia, Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión Jesús Usón, Cáceres, España.
Unidad de Laparoscopia, Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión Jesús Usón, Cáceres, España.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Sep;43(7):348-354. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 May 23.
The aim of this study is to prove the effectiveness of a low cost, artificial model for training of a laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis.
This study included urologists who attended specialised courses on laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) held during the period 2015 to 2017. They were divided into 2 groups according to their previous experience in laparoscopic surgery. The tasks performed on the artificial simulator were prostate resection, "task 1", and urethrovesical anastomosis, "task 2". Once these exercises were completed, the study participants filled in an anonymous questionnaire regarding their demographic data and experience level in laparoscopic surgery (LS). In addition, they gave their opinions about the didactic capacity of the artificial organ and evaluated its usefulness as a tool for LRP training. To demonstrate face and content validity, the participants judged the texture, consistency, morphology and evaluated its similarity to the real organ. The assessment was made with a five-point Likert scale.
The students were divided into 2groups: 10 experts (Group E) and 12 novices (Group N). The only significant difference between the scores of novices and experts was regarding the inclusion of this tool in the training programs (Group E=5 points versus group N=4.4±0.59, P=.024). The experts' group rated all the items with higher scores than the novices' one. Regarding the general assessment of the simulation model, the novice participants gave an average score of 8.00±0.91 points out of 10, while the experts' group granted higher scores of 9.4±0,51.
This artificial model has shown to have an elevated face, content and construct validity, as well being an optimal didactic tool for training in the techniques of prostate resection and laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis.
本研究旨在证明一种低成本的人工模型用于腹腔镜下尿道膀胱吻合术训练的有效性。
本研究纳入了2015年至2017年期间参加腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LRP)专业课程的泌尿外科医生。根据他们以往的腹腔镜手术经验将其分为两组。在人工模拟器上进行的任务有前列腺切除术(“任务1”)和尿道膀胱吻合术(“任务2”)。完成这些练习后,研究参与者填写一份关于他们的人口统计学数据和腹腔镜手术(LS)经验水平的匿名问卷。此外,他们对人工器官的教学能力发表意见,并评估其作为LRP训练工具的实用性。为了证明表面效度和内容效度,参与者对质地、一致性、形态进行判断,并评估其与真实器官的相似性。评估采用五点李克特量表进行。
学生分为两组:10名专家(E组)和12名新手(N组)。新手和专家得分之间唯一的显著差异在于该工具是否纳入培训计划(E组=5分,N组=4.4±0.59分,P=0.024)。专家组对所有项目的评分均高于新手组。关于模拟模型的总体评估,新手参与者给出的平均评分为8.00±0.91分(满分10分),而专家组给出的更高分数为9.4±0.51分。
该人工模型已显示出较高的表面效度、内容效度和结构效度,并且是前列腺切除术和腹腔镜尿道膀胱吻合术技术训练的最佳教学工具。