Wakasaki Takahiro, Yasumatsu Ryuji, Uchi Ryutaro, Taura Masahiko, Matsuo Mioko, Komune Noritaka, Nakagawa Takashi
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2020 Feb;47(1):116-122. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 23.
Although nivolumab treatment is effective in extending the overall survival (OS) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC), only a few patients benefit from this treatment. Recent studies have reported that chemotherapy and cetuximab might be effective for R/M HNSCC after nivolumab treatment. In the present study, we aimed to elucidate the effectiveness of chemotherapy after nivolumab treatment in patients with R/M HNSCC.
This retrospective study included 10 patients with R/M HNSCC who were mainly treated with paclitaxel plus cetuximab (7/10, 70%) or S-1 (3/10, 30%) following nivolumab treatment. Chemotherapy was administered as a second-line or higher palliative treatment. The performance status of all patients ranged from 0 to 2. The progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
The response rate (RR), clinical benefit rate, and median PFS were 60%, 90%, and 5.4 months, respectively. Regarding adverse effects, Grade 3 neutropenia and hypomagnesemia due to salvage chemotherapy administered after immunotherapy were observed in one patient. The treatment significantly increased the RR compared to that achieved with other palliative chemotherapies reported so far.
A higher RR and clinical benefit rate were observed for our strategy than for any first-line regimen, suggesting that our strategy might improve the PFS. Palliative chemotherapy with/without cetuximab after nivolumab treatment might be useful in patients with R/M HNSCC. Although the results of this retrospective study are limited, this strategy can be a good treatment option for patients with R/M HNSCC because of its strong clinical benefits and acceptable toxicity.
尽管纳武利尤单抗治疗可有效延长复发和/或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(R/M HNSCC)患者的总生存期(OS),但仅有少数患者能从此治疗中获益。近期研究报道,化疗和西妥昔单抗可能对纳武利尤单抗治疗后的R/M HNSCC有效。在本研究中,我们旨在阐明纳武利尤单抗治疗后化疗对R/M HNSCC患者的有效性。
本回顾性研究纳入了10例R/M HNSCC患者,这些患者在接受纳武利尤单抗治疗后主要接受了紫杉醇联合西妥昔单抗(7/10,70%)或S-1(3/10,30%)治疗。化疗作为二线或更高线的姑息治疗。所有患者的体能状态评分为0至2分。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析无进展生存期(PFS)。
缓解率(RR)、临床获益率和中位PFS分别为60%、90%和5.4个月。关于不良反应,1例患者出现了因免疫治疗后挽救性化疗导致的3级中性粒细胞减少和低镁血症。与迄今报道的其他姑息性化疗相比,该治疗显著提高了RR。
我们的治疗策略比任何一线治疗方案都观察到了更高的RR和临床获益率,这表明我们的策略可能改善PFS。纳武利尤单抗治疗后联合或不联合西妥昔单抗的姑息性化疗可能对R/M HNSCC患者有用。尽管这项回顾性研究的结果有限,但由于其显著的临床获益和可接受的毒性,该策略可为R/M HNSCC患者提供一个良好的治疗选择。