Curto Vilsa, Einav Liran, Finkelstein Amy, Levin Jonathan, Bhattacharya Jay
Curto: Department of Health Policy and Management, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 (
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2019 Apr;11(2):302-332. doi: 10.1257/app.20170295.
We compare healthcare spending in public and private Medicare using newly available claims data from Medicare Advantage (MA) insurers. MA insurer revenues are 30 percent higher than their healthcare spending. Adjusting for enrollee mix, healthcare spending per enrollee in MA is 9 to 30 percent lower than in traditional Medicare (TM), depending on the way we define "comparable" enrollees. Spending differences primarily reflect differences in healthcare utilization, with similar reductions for "high value" and "low value" care, rather than healthcare prices. We present evidence consistent with MA plans encouraging substitution to less expensive care and engaging in utilization management. ( H11, H42, H51, I11, I13).
我们使用医疗保险优势(MA)保险公司最新可得的理赔数据,比较了公共医疗保险和私人医疗保险的医疗支出情况。MA保险公司的收入比其医疗支出高出30%。根据我们定义“可比”参保人的方式,在调整参保人组合后,MA中每位参保人的医疗支出比传统医疗保险(TM)低9%至30%。支出差异主要反映了医疗服务利用方面的差异,“高价值”和“低价值”医疗服务的减少幅度相似,而非医疗价格的差异。我们提供的证据表明,MA计划鼓励人们改用成本较低的医疗服务,并进行医疗服务利用管理。(H11、H42、H51、I11、I13)