Suppr超能文献

与传统医疗保险相比,医疗保险优势计划中择期外科手术的围手术期成本。

Perioperative Costs of Elective Surgical Procedures in Medicare Advantage Compared With Traditional Medicare.

作者信息

Politzer Eran, Anderson Timothy S, Ayanian John Z, Curto Vilsa E, Souza Jeffrey, Tsai Thomas C, Landon Bruce E

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Federmann School of Public Policy and Governance, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Aug 1;6(8):e252258. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2258.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The utilization of elective surgical procedures is lower for patients enrolled in Medicare Advantage (MA) than in traditional Medicare (TM), but it remains unclear whether surgical episode costs differ between MA and TM for comparable patients.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the estimated costs, markers of resource use (eg, length of stay and location of surgery), and outcomes of surgical episodes for similar patients enrolled in MA and TM.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this retrospective cohort study, 2019 Medicare claims and encounters data were analyzed to compare differences in surgical episode costs for beneficiaries with MA vs TM who underwent common elective surgical procedures across 11 categories. Procedures performed in either inpatient or outpatient settings were included in the analysis. Data were analyzed from January 2023 to March 2025.

EXPOSURES

Enrollment in MA or TM.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were estimated 30-day costs of surgical episodes and factors affecting costs and/or outcomes, including share of inpatient procedures, length of stay, share of patients discharged home, and 30-day readmission rates. A secondary outcome explored potential facility selection and patient steering by estimating the distance traveled to surgery. Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for the type of surgical procedure, patient characteristics, and their Elixhauser Comorbidity Index were used to compare outcomes of surgical episodes in patients with MA vs TM within hospital referral regions.

RESULTS

The analysis included 1 177 700 surgical procedures among 1 110 263 Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 73.42 [5.8] years; 686 708 females [58.3%]). The overall rate of surgery utilization was lower among MA patients vs TM patients (difference in rate, -4.4%; 95% CI, -4.8% to -4.1%), with variation found across surgical categories. Across procedures, 30-day surgical episode costs for MA patients vs TM patients were, on average, $671 (95% CI, $639-$702) lower. The share of procedures billed at the higher inpatient rate was 5.41 (95% CI, 5.23-5.58) percentage points (pp) lower for MA patients than for TM patients, and the mean length of inpatient stay was 0.27 (95% CI, 0.26-0.29) days shorter. The share of patients discharged home was higher for those with MA vs TM (3.82 [95% CI, 3.65-3.99] pp). MA patients traveled a mean of 2.32 (95% CI, 1.62-3.01) miles farther for surgery. Readmission rates were lower for patients with MA (-0.70 [95% CI, -0.83 to -0.58] pp).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found that in addition to lower utilization of common elective surgical procedures, the costs of surgical episodes were lower for patients enrolled in MA than those enrolled in TM. MA plans had lower costs because more procedures were performed in outpatient settings, required shorter lengths of stay, and less expensive postacute care, with no apparent harm to overall quality. Physician and surgical facility selection and patient steering likely contributed to these cost differences. These findings highlight potential mechanisms by which MA plans may achieve cost savings compared with TM plans.

摘要

重要性

参加医疗保险优势计划(MA)的患者进行选择性外科手术的利用率低于参加传统医疗保险(TM)的患者,但对于可比患者,MA和TM之间的手术费用是否存在差异仍不清楚。

目的

比较参加MA和TM的类似患者的手术费用估计值、资源使用指标(如住院时间和手术地点)以及手术结果。

设计、设置和参与者:在这项回顾性队列研究中,分析了2019年医疗保险索赔和就诊数据,以比较接受11类常见选择性外科手术的MA受益人与TM受益人在手术费用方面的差异。分析包括在住院或门诊环境中进行的手术。数据于2023年1月至2025年3月进行分析。

暴露因素

参加MA或TM。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是手术30天费用估计值以及影响费用和/或结局的因素,包括住院手术比例、住院时间、出院回家患者比例和30天再入院率。次要结局通过估计前往手术地点的距离来探索潜在的医疗机构选择和患者导向。使用针对手术类型、患者特征及其埃利克斯豪泽合并症指数进行调整的多变量线性回归模型,比较医院转诊区域内MA患者与TM患者的手术结局。

结果

分析纳入了1110263名医疗保险受益人中的1177700例外科手术(平均[标准差]年龄,73.42[5.8]岁;686708名女性[58.3%])。MA患者的手术总体利用率低于TM患者(使用率差异为-4.4%;95%置信区间,-4.8%至-4.1%),不同手术类别存在差异。在所有手术中,MA患者与TM患者相比,30天手术费用平均低671美元(95%置信区间,639 - 702美元)。MA患者按较高住院费率计费的手术比例比TM患者低5.41(95%置信区间,5.23 - 5.58)个百分点(pp),平均住院天数短0.27(95%置信区间,0.26 - 0.29)天。MA患者出院回家的比例高于TM患者(3.82[95%置信区间,3.65 - 3.99]pp)。MA患者前往手术的平均距离远2.32(95%置信区间,1.62 - 3.01)英里。MA患者的再入院率较低(-0.70[95%置信区间,-0.83至-0.58]pp)。

结论及相关性

本研究发现,除了常见选择性外科手术利用率较低外,参加MA的患者手术费用低于参加TM的患者。MA计划成本较低是因为更多手术在门诊进行,住院时间较短,急性后期护理费用较低,且对总体质量无明显损害。医生和手术机构的选择以及患者导向可能导致了这些成本差异。这些发现突出了MA计划与TM计划相比可能实现成本节约的潜在机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e6/12317349/832b083ce49b/jamahealthforum-e252258-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验