Suppr超能文献

不平等维度与生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康(RMNCH)选择指标关联的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between dimensions of inequality and a selection of indicators of Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (RMNCH).

机构信息

School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Glob Health. 2019 Jun;9(1):010429. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.010429.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Globally, progress in Maternal and Child Health (MCH) has been inconsistent, with several evidence showing both between and within country disparities in several RMNCH outcome measures. In this study, we aim to meta-analyse existing literature on association between three major equity stratifiers and a selection of RMNCH indicators.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus databases and grey literatures from the WHO, UNICEF and World Bank publications. Using the PRISMA guidelines, we identified and reviewed studies from low and middle-income countries, that explored the effects of inequalities on RMNCH, with focus on studies that utilised data from a nationally representative survey. The review protocol was registered at the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews.

RESULTS

A total of 28 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Results revealed the existence of marked inequality based on income levels, education and place of residence. The most significant level of disparity was with regards to unmet need for contraception and antenatal coverage. For both respective indicators, those with secondary or higher education were 6 times more likely to have better coverage, than those with lesser level of education; (odds ratio (OR) = 6.25 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.68-23.23; I = 98%,  = 0.006) and (OR = 6.17 (95% CI = 3.03-12.56; I = 97%,  < 0.00001) respectively. In contrast, the lowest inequality was in the completion of 3 doses of diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus vaccines (DPT3), those with primary or no education, were equally as likely as those with secondary or higher education to have received DPT3; (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.34-4.27; I = 96%,  = 0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

In developing countries, maternal and child health coverage remains highly inequitable and assess to maternal and child health services are governed by factors such as income, level of education, and place of residence.

摘要

背景

全球范围内,妇幼健康(MCH)的进展参差不齐,有证据表明,在几个母婴健康相关指标方面,存在国家间和国家内的差异。本研究旨在对三个主要公平分层因素与母婴健康相关指标之间关系的现有文献进行荟萃分析。

方法

我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Scopus 数据库和世界卫生组织、联合国儿童基金会和世界银行出版物中的灰色文献。根据 PRISMA 指南,我们从低收入和中等收入国家中确定并回顾了探索不平等对母婴健康影响的研究,重点关注利用全国代表性调查数据的研究。审查方案在 PROSPERO 国际系统评价前瞻性登记处进行了注册。

结果

共有 28 项研究纳入荟萃分析。结果表明,基于收入水平、教育程度和居住地,存在明显的不平等现象。差异最显著的是避孕需求未得到满足和产前覆盖率。对于这两个指标,接受过中等或高等教育的人比接受过较少教育的人更有可能获得更好的覆盖率;(比值比(OR)= 6.25(95%置信区间(CI)= 1.68-23.23;I = 98%, = 0.006)和(OR = 6.17(95% CI = 3.03-12.56;I = 97%, < 0.00001)。相比之下,完成三剂白喉、百日咳和破伤风疫苗(DPT3)的接种率差异最小,接受过小学或未接受过教育的人,与接受过中等或高等教育的人一样,同样有可能接种了 DPT3;(OR = 1.21,95% CI = 0.34-4.27;I = 96%, = 0.77)。

结论

在发展中国家,母婴健康的覆盖范围仍然极不平等,获得母婴健康服务的机会受到收入、教育程度和居住地等因素的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验