School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Institute for Academic Development, The University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , United Kingdom.
Med Teach. 2019 Oct;41(10):1203-1205. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1615610. Epub 2019 May 26.
Students are ever more involved in the design of educational practices, which is reflected in the growing body of literature about approaches to student participation. Similarities and differences between these approaches often remain vague since the terms are used interchangeably. This confusing and fragmented body of literature hampers our understanding the process and outcomes of student participation and choosing the most suitable approach for it. We identified the three most frequently used terms related to the design of learning and teaching - design-based research (DBR), participatory design (PD), and co-creation - and disentangled the terminology by focusing on relevant definitions, aims, involvement of students, outcomes, and related terminology. Differences between the approaches to student participation can be found in the degree to which students are the central actors and the degree to which the design is informed by educational theory. It is important to align the level of student participation with the purpose of the approach.
学生越来越多地参与到教育实践的设计中,这反映在越来越多的关于学生参与方法的文献中。由于这些术语可以互换使用,因此它们之间的相似之处和差异通常仍然模糊不清。这种混乱和分散的文献阻碍了我们对学生参与过程和结果的理解,并阻碍了我们选择最适合的方法。我们确定了与学习和教学设计最相关的三个术语——基于设计的研究(DBR)、参与式设计(PD)和共同创造,并通过关注相关定义、目标、学生参与程度、结果和相关术语来理清术语。可以在学生作为核心参与者的程度以及设计受教育理论影响的程度之间找到学生参与方法之间的差异。将学生参与的程度与方法的目的保持一致是很重要的。