• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经 BioSTAR 和 Amplatzer 卵圆孔未闭封堵器闭合卵圆孔未闭后的长期经食管超声心动图检查。

Long-term transesophageal echocardiography after patent foramen ovale closure by BioSTAR and Amplatzer patent foramen ovale occluders.

机构信息

MC Medicor Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Department of Cardiology, General Hospital Izola, Izola, Slovenia.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 15;95(3):349-354. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28360. Epub 2019 May 27.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.28360
PMID:31131978
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) findings after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure by BioSTAR (NMT Medical Inc, Boston, MA) and Amplatzer PFO occluders (Abbott Vascular, Plymouth, MN).

BACKGROUND

PFO closure with a biodegradable device represents an attractive alternative to permanent devices. Long-term effectiveness and morphology after biodegradation remain unknown.

METHODS

Between February 2008 and June 2014, 49 patients received BioSTAR and 48 Amplatzer PFO occluder. TOE was performed after closure, at 6 months and beyond 2 years.

RESULTS

PFO features were comparable between the groups. Immediate effective closure (<5 bubbles on Valsalva) was obtained in 96% by BioSTAR and 88% by Amplatzer PFO occluder (p = .16). Except for transient fever after BioSTAR (10.8 vs. 0%; p = .08), there was no adverse events. TOE at 6 months revealed comparable effective closure (93 vs. 89%; p = .74), all devices in correct position and no thrombus/pericardial effusion. In the BioSTAR group, a peri-device left-to-right color Doppler shunt was documented in one patient (2.2%), protrusion of the nitinol framework strut(s) into the atrial cavity in two patients (4.3%), and both events in one patient (2.2%). TOE beyond 2 years showed comparable effective closure (92 vs. 96%; p = 1.00) and again BioSTAR-associated peri-device left-to-right shunt and metal framework strut(s) protrusion. There was no stroke or peripheral embolization in either group while TIA was numerically greater in BioSTAR patients (6.8 vs. 2.5%; p = .61).

CONCLUSION

BioSTAR provided similar PFO closure rate as Amplatzer PFO occluder. As yet unreported BioSTAR-associated peri-device left-to-right shunt and metal framework strut(s) protrusion may have practical implications for further development of biodegradable devices.

摘要

目的

比较经胸超声心动图(TOE)在应用 BioSTAR(NMT Medical Inc,波士顿,马萨诸塞州)和 Amplatzer 卵圆孔未闭(PFO)封堵器(雅培血管,普利茅斯,明尼苏达州)关闭卵圆孔未闭(PFO)后的发现。

背景

使用可生物降解装置进行 PFO 封堵代表了永久性装置的一种有吸引力的替代方法。但长期有效性和生物降解后的形态仍不清楚。

方法

在 2008 年 2 月至 2014 年 6 月期间,49 例患者接受了 BioSTAR 治疗,48 例患者接受了 Amplatzer PFO 封堵器治疗。封堵后、6 个月和 2 年以上进行 TOE。

结果

两组 PFO 特征相似。BioSTAR 组即刻有效封堵率(<5 个瓦尔萨尔瓦动作气泡)为 96%,Amplatzer PFO 封堵器组为 88%(p=.16)。除 BioSTAR 后出现一过性发热(10.8%比 0%;p=.08)外,两组均无不良事件。6 个月时的 TOE 显示出相似的有效封堵率(93%比 89%;p=.74),所有装置均位于正确位置,无血栓/心包积液。在 BioSTAR 组中,1 例(2.2%)患者出现器械周围左向右彩色多普勒分流,2 例(4.3%)患者出现 Nitinol 框架支柱突入心房腔,1 例(2.2%)患者同时出现这两种情况。2 年以上的 TOE 显示出相似的有效封堵率(92%比 96%;p= 1.00),同时还显示出与 BioSTAR 相关的器械周围左向右分流和金属框架支柱突入。两组均无卒中或外周栓塞,而 BioSTAR 患者的短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)发生率更高(6.8%比 2.5%;p=.61)。

结论

BioSTAR 提供了与 Amplatzer PFO 封堵器相似的 PFO 封堵率。尚未报道的 BioSTAR 相关器械周围左向右分流和金属框架支柱突入可能对可生物降解装置的进一步发展具有实际意义。

相似文献

1
Long-term transesophageal echocardiography after patent foramen ovale closure by BioSTAR and Amplatzer patent foramen ovale occluders.经 BioSTAR 和 Amplatzer 卵圆孔未闭封堵器闭合卵圆孔未闭后的长期经食管超声心动图检查。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 15;95(3):349-354. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28360. Epub 2019 May 27.
2
The Flatstent versus the conventional umbrella devices in the percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale.扁平支架与传统伞状装置用于经皮闭合卵圆孔未闭的比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;85(6):1058-65. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25750. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
3
Comparison of residual shunt rate and complications across 6 different closure devices for patent foramen ovale.比较 6 种不同的卵圆孔未闭封堵装置的残余分流率和并发症。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 15;95(3):365-372. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28527. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
4
Residual Shunt after Patent Foramen Ovale Device Closure in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke: Serial Bubble Contrast Transesophageal Echocardiography Data.隐源性卒中患者卵圆孔未闭封堵术后的残余分流:系列气泡对比经食管超声心动图数据
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Feb;28(2):347-353. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
5
Residual shunt after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale with AMPLATZER occluder devices - influence of anatomic features: a transcranial Doppler and intracardiac echocardiography study.经皮卵圆孔未闭封堵术后残余分流 - 解剖特征的影响:经颅多普勒和腔内超声心动图研究。
EuroIntervention. 2013 Jul;9(3):382-8. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I3A61.
6
Figulla PFO occluder versus Amplatzer PFO occluder for percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale.对比 Figulla PFO 封堵器和 Amplatzer PFO 封堵器经皮治疗卵圆孔未闭的疗效。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Apr 1;77(5):709-14. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22737. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
7
Efficacy of different devices for transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale assessed by serial transoesophageal echocardiography and rates of recurrent cerebrovascular events in a long-term follow-up.经食管超声心动图连续评估不同封堵器对卵圆孔未闭封堵的疗效及长期随访中复发性脑血管事件的发生率。
EuroIntervention. 2015 May;11(1):85-91. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M01_02.
8
Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale with a bioabsorbable occluder device: single-centre experience.使用生物可吸收封堵器经皮闭合卵圆孔未闭:单中心经验
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Oct 1;74(4):607-14. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22033.
9
A novel system for transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale: clinical and echocardiographic outcome comparison with other contemporary devices.一种新型的卵圆孔未闭经导管封堵系统:与其他当代器械的临床和超声心动图结果比较。
Can J Cardiol. 2014 Jun;30(6):639-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.03.015. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
10
Patent foramen ovale with complex anatomy: Comparison of two different devices (Amplatzer Septal Occluder device and Amplatzer PFO Occluder device 30/35).卵圆孔未闭伴复杂解剖结构:两种不同封堵器(Amplatzer 房间隔封堵器和 Amplatzer PFO 封堵器 30/35)的比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Mar 15;279:47-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.10.053. Epub 2018 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Patent Foramen Ovale Occluder With Left Clamp Arms: Preclinical Experiment and First-in-Human Study.一种带有左夹臂的新型卵圆孔未闭封堵器:临床前实验和首例人体研究。
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2025 Apr;10(4):422-433. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2024.11.012. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
2
A Retrospective Analysis of Self-Limiting Fever following Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale and Atrial Septal Defect Closure.经皮卵圆孔未闭和房间隔缺损封堵术后自限性发热的回顾性分析
Cardiol Res Pract. 2024 Oct 9;2024:5562208. doi: 10.1155/2024/5562208. eCollection 2024.
3
Relationship between patent foramen ovale anatomical features and residual shunt after patent foramen ovale closure.
卵圆孔未闭解剖特征与卵圆孔未闭封堵术后残余分流的关系。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Apr;39(2):200-206. doi: 10.1007/s12928-023-00979-y. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
4
Transesophageal echocardiography-guided percutaneous closure of the patent foramen ovale only uses the sheath.经食管超声心动图引导下经皮卵圆孔未闭封堵术仅使用鞘管。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2023 Aug 31;13(4):728-735. doi: 10.21037/cdt-22-513. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
5
Patent Foramen Ovale-associated Stroke and COVID-19 Vaccination.卵圆孔未闭相关卒中与新冠病毒疫苗接种
Interv Cardiol. 2023 Apr 5;18:e10. doi: 10.15420/icr.2022.27. eCollection 2023.
6
Favorable mid-term performance of fully biodegradable implantable device for ventricular septal defect closure.用于室间隔缺损封堵的完全可生物降解植入装置的中期良好性能。
JTCVS Tech. 2022 Dec 10;17:133-137. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.11.010. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
A Prospective, Single-Center, Phase I Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Value of Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale With a Novel Biodegradable Occluder.一项前瞻性、单中心、I期临床试验,旨在评估经食管超声心动图在使用新型可生物降解封堵器闭合卵圆孔未闭中的价值。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 3;9:849459. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.849459. eCollection 2022.