Suppr超能文献

抗血管内皮生长因子治疗视网膜疾病:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for retinal conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 May 28;9(5):e022031. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022031.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab, ranibizumab and aflibercept for patients with choroidal neovascular age-related macular degeneration (cn-AMD), diabetic macular oedema (DMO), macular oedema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO-MO) and myopic choroidal neovascularisation (m-CNV).

DESIGN

Systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis.

METHODS

Multiple databases were searched from inception to 17 August 2017. Eligible head-to-head randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the (anti-VEGF) drugs in adult patients aged ≥18 years with the retinal conditions of interest. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias.

RESULTS

19 RCTs involving 7459 patients with cn-AMD (n=12), DMO (n=3), RVO-MO (n=2) and m-CNV (n=2) were included. Vision gain was not significantly different in patients with cn-AMD, DMO, RVO-MO and m-CNV treated with bevacizumab versus ranibizumab. Similarly, vision gain was not significantly different between cn-AMD patients treated with aflibercept versus ranibizumab. Patients with DMO treated with aflibercept experienced significantly higher vision gain at 12 months than patients receiving ranibizumab or bevacizumab; however, this difference was not significant at 24 months. Rates of systemic serious harms were similar across anti-VEGF agents. Posthoc analyses revealed that an as-needed treatment regimen (6-9 injections per year) was associated with a mortality increase of 1.8% (risk ratio: 2.0 [1.2 to 3.5], 2 RCTs, 1795 patients) compared with monthly treatment in cn-AMD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal bevacizumab was a reasonable alternative to ranibizumab and aflibercept in patients with cn-AMD, DMO, RVO-MO and m-CNV. The only exception was for patients with DME and low visual acuity (<69 early treatment diabetic retinopathy study [ETDRS] letters), where treatment with aflibercept was associated with significantly higher vision gain (≥15 ETDRS letters) than bevacizumab or ranibizumab at 12 months; but the significant effects were not maintained at 24 months. The choice of anti-VEGF drugs may depend on the specific retinal condition, baseline visual acuity and treatment regimen.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42015022041.

摘要

目的

评估玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗和阿柏西普治疗年龄相关性黄斑变性脉络膜新生血管(cn-AMD)、糖尿病黄斑水肿(DMO)、视网膜静脉阻塞黄斑水肿(RVO-MO)和近视性脉络膜新生血管(m-CNV)患者的疗效和安全性。

设计

系统评价和随机效应荟萃分析。

方法

从建库至 2017 年 8 月 17 日,检索多个数据库。纳入比较贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗和阿柏西普治疗年龄≥18 岁且患有上述视网膜疾病的成年患者的头对头随机对照试验(RCT)。两位评审员独立筛选研究、提取数据和评估偏倚风险。

结果

纳入了 19 项 RCT 共 7459 例 cn-AMD(n=12)、DMO(n=3)、RVO-MO(n=2)和 m-CNV(n=2)患者。cn-AMD、DMO、RVO-MO 和 m-CNV 患者接受贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗的视力增益无显著差异。同样,cn-AMD 患者接受阿柏西普治疗的视力增益也不低于雷珠单抗。DMO 患者接受阿柏西普治疗 12 个月时的视力增益显著高于接受雷珠单抗或贝伐单抗治疗的患者,但 24 个月时的差异不显著。各抗 VEGF 药物的全身性严重不良事件发生率相似。事后分析显示,与每月治疗相比,cn-AMD 患者按需治疗方案(每年 6-9 次注射)与死亡率增加 1.8%相关(风险比:2.0 [1.2 至 3.5],2 项 RCT,1795 例患者)。

结论

在 cn-AMD、DMO、RVO-MO 和 m-CNV 患者中,玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗是雷珠单抗和阿柏西普的合理替代药物。唯一的例外是视力低于(<69 个早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究 [ETDRS] 字母)的 DME 患者,与贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗相比,阿柏西普治疗 12 个月时视力增益显著更高(≥15 ETDRS 字母),但 24 个月时无显著效果。抗 VEGF 药物的选择可能取决于特定的视网膜状况、基线视力和治疗方案。

前瞻性注册号

CRD42015022041。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9b7/6549720/be39febab4bd/bmjopen-2018-022031f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验