Gode Sercan, Lieber Stefan, Nakassa Ana Carolina Igami, Wang Eric W, Fernandez-Miranda Juan C, Gardner Paul A, Snyderman Carl H
Department of Otolaryngology, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2019 Jun;80(3):276-282. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668517. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
The aim of this study is to report the clinical outcome of extracranial pericranial flaps (ePCF) used for reconstruction of clival dural defects following failure of primary repair. Retrospective review of skull base database. Academic medical center. Patients undergoing reconstruction of clival defects with ePCF following endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES). Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, meningitis, and flap necrosis. Seven patients (five males and two females) who underwent ePCF reconstruction for clival defects following EES were included. All patients (ages 8-64 years) had a postoperative CSF leak due to a failed primary clival reconstruction (five had one, one had two, and one had three failed CSF leak repairs prior to ePCF reconstruction). Nasoseptal and inferior turbinate (lateral nasal wall) flaps were not available for secondary reconstruction due to prior surgeries. The immediate success rate of ePCF for the reconstruction of clival defects in patients with multiple flap failures was 58%. Two patients developed CSF leaks that were successfully repaired endoscopically with the addition of free tissue grafts; one patient had partial flap necrosis that required debridement; none required an additional vascularized flap. Width of the defect, length of the defect, properties of the ePCF, and age did not demonstrate significance ( > 0.05) for adverse outcome. An ePCF is a reconstructive option for high-risk, large clival defects when other local and regional vascularized flaps are not available or fail. ePCFs can be used for reconstruction of clival defects in all populations, including pediatric patients.
本研究的目的是报告在初次修复失败后,使用颅外颅骨膜瓣(ePCF)修复斜坡硬脑膜缺损的临床结果。
对颅底数据库进行回顾性研究。
学术医疗中心。
在内镜鼻内手术(EES)后接受ePCF修复斜坡缺损的患者。
术后脑脊液(CSF)漏、脑膜炎和皮瓣坏死。
纳入7例(5例男性和2例女性)在EES后接受ePCF修复斜坡缺损的患者。所有患者(年龄8 - 64岁)因初次斜坡重建失败而出现术后脑脊液漏(5例有1次,1例有2次,1例在ePCF重建前有3次脑脊液漏修复失败)。由于先前的手术,鼻中隔和下鼻甲(鼻侧壁)瓣无法用于二次重建。在多次皮瓣失败的患者中,ePCF修复斜坡缺损的即时成功率为58%。2例患者出现脑脊液漏,在内镜下加用游离组织移植成功修复;1例患者出现部分皮瓣坏死,需要清创;均无需额外的带血管皮瓣。缺损宽度、缺损长度、ePCF的特性和年龄对不良结局无显著意义(P>0.05)。
当其他局部和区域带血管皮瓣不可用或失败时,ePCF是高危、大斜坡缺损的一种重建选择。ePCF可用于所有人群,包括儿科患者的斜坡缺损重建。