Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Urol. 2019 Nov;202(5):973-978. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000352. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
It remains controversial whether external beam radiation therapy with a brachytherapy boost provides oncologic outcomes equivalent to those of radical prostatectomy with or without adjuvant radiation therapy in men with Gleason 9-10 prostate cancer. We compared external beam radiation therapy plus brachytherapy to radical prostatectomy plus adjuvant radiation therapy for Gleason 9-10 prostate cancer in terms of overall survival and prostate cancer specific mortality in 2 large national databases.
Using the NCDB (National Cancer Database) and the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database, we identified 4,367 and 2,276 patients, respectively, diagnosed with clinical T1-T3N0M0, Gleason 9-10, prostate specific antigen 0 to 40 ng/ml prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy plus brachytherapy or radical prostatectomy plus adjuvant radiation therapy. We compared overall survival and prostate cancer specific mortality using inverse probability of treatment weighted multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modeling after accounting for clinical and demographic factors.
Median followup in the NCDB and SEER cohorts was 6.0 years and 5.8 years, respectively. In the NCDB cohort there was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival between radical prostatectomy plus adjuvant radiation therapy vs external beam radiation therapy plus brachytherapy (86.7% vs 87.0%, AHR 1.10, 95% CI 0.95-1.27, p=0.220). Results were unchanged when including only patients who received androgen deprivation therapy. In the SEER cohort there was no difference in 5-year prostate cancer specific mortality (6.0% vs 5.7%, AHR 1.22, 95% CI 0.0.88-1.71, p=0.234). There was no significant interaction between patient age (65 years or greater vs less than 65) and treatment modality in the NCDB or SEER cohorts.
In men with Gleason 9-10 prostate cancer multimodality surgical therapy is equivalent to external beam radiation therapy plus brachytherapy.
对于 Gleason 9-10 前列腺癌患者,外照射放疗联合近距离放疗是否能提供与根治性前列腺切除术加或不加辅助放疗相当的肿瘤学结果,这仍然存在争议。我们在两个大型国家数据库中比较了外照射放疗联合近距离放疗与根治性前列腺切除术加辅助放疗在总生存和前列腺癌特异性死亡率方面的差异。
使用 NCDB(国家癌症数据库)和 SEER(监测、流行病学和最终结果)数据库,我们分别确定了 4367 名和 2276 名临床 T1-T3N0M0、Gleason 9-10、前列腺特异性抗原 0-40ng/ml 的患者,他们接受了外照射放疗联合近距离放疗或根治性前列腺切除术加辅助放疗治疗。我们通过逆概率治疗加权多变量 Cox 比例风险回归模型比较了总生存和前列腺癌特异性死亡率,同时考虑了临床和人口统计学因素。
NCDB 和 SEER 队列的中位随访时间分别为 6.0 年和 5.8 年。在 NCDB 队列中,根治性前列腺切除术加辅助放疗与外照射放疗联合近距离放疗在 5 年总生存率方面没有显著差异(86.7%vs87.0%,AHR1.10,95%CI0.95-1.27,p=0.220)。当只包括接受雄激素剥夺治疗的患者时,结果仍然不变。在 SEER 队列中,5 年前列腺癌特异性死亡率无差异(6.0%vs5.7%,AHR1.22,95%CI0.0.88-1.71,p=0.234)。在 NCDB 或 SEER 队列中,患者年龄(65 岁或以上与<65 岁)与治疗方式之间没有显著的交互作用。
对于 Gleason 9-10 前列腺癌患者,多模式手术治疗与外照射放疗联合近距离放疗相当。