• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于日本大型队列(MSUG94)机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术标本的5级病理分组前列腺癌患者的预后因素

Prognostic factors among patients with pathological Grade Group 5 prostate cancer based on robot-associated radical prostatectomy specimens from a large Japanese cohort (MSUG94).

作者信息

Sasaki Takeshi, Ebara Shin, Tatenuma Tomoyuki, Ikehata Yoshinori, Nakayama Akinori, Kawase Makoto, Toide Masahiro, Yoneda Tatsuaki, Sakaguchi Kazushige, Teishima Jun, Makiyama Kazuhide, Kitamura Hiroshi, Saito Kazutaka, Koie Takuya, Koga Fumitaka, Urakami Shinji, Inoue Takahiro

机构信息

Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.

Department of Urology, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2024 Mar 14;42(1):152. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04864-y.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-024-04864-y
PMID:38483586
Abstract

PURPOSE

There are no definitive prognostic factors for patients with pathological Grade Group 5 (pGG 5) prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing robot-associated radical prostatectomy (RARP). This study aimed to explore the prognostic factors among patients with pGG 5 PCa in a large Japanese cohort (MSUG94).

METHODS

This retrospective, multi-institutional cohort study was conducted between 2012 and 2021 at ten centers in Japan and included 3195 patients. Patients with clinically metastatic PCa (cN1 or cM1) and those receiving neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy were excluded. Finally, 217 patients with pGG5 PCa were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 28.0 months. The 3- and 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) rates of the overall population were 66.1% and 57.7%, respectively. The optimal threshold value (47.2%) for the percentage of positive cancer cores (PPCC) with any GG by systematic biopsy was chosen based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Univariate analysis revealed that the prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis, pT, pN, positive surgical margins (PSMs), lymphovascular invasion, and PPCC were independent prognostic factors for BCRFS. A multivariate analysis revealed that PSMs and PPCC were independent prognostic factors for BCRFS. Using these two predictors, we stratified BCRFS, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and castration-resistant PCa-free survival (CRPC-FS) among patients with pGG 5 PCa.

CONCLUSION

The combination of PSMs and PPCC may be an important predictor of BCRFS, MFS, and CRPC-FS in patients with pGG 5 PCa undergoing RARP.

摘要

目的

对于接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)的病理5级组(pGG 5)前列腺癌(PCa)患者,目前尚无明确的预后因素。本研究旨在探讨日本大型队列(MSUG94)中pGG 5 PCa患者的预后因素。

方法

本回顾性、多机构队列研究于2012年至2021年在日本的10个中心进行,纳入3195例患者。排除临床转移性PCa(cN1或cM1)患者以及接受新辅助和/或辅助治疗的患者。最终,对217例pGG5 PCa患者进行了分析。

结果

中位随访期为28.0个月。总体人群的3年和5年无生化复发生存率(BCRFS)分别为66.1%和57.7%。根据受试者工作特征曲线分析,选择系统活检中任何GG级阳性癌灶百分比(PPCC)的最佳阈值(47.2%)。单因素分析显示,诊断时的前列腺特异性抗原水平、pT、pN、手术切缘阳性(PSM)、淋巴血管侵犯和PPCC是BCRFS的独立预后因素。多因素分析显示,PSM和PPCC是BCRFS的独立预后因素。使用这两个预测指标,我们对pGG 5 PCa患者的BCRFS、无转移生存率(MFS)和去势抵抗性前列腺癌无进展生存率(CRPC-FS)进行了分层。

结论

PSM和PPCC的组合可能是接受RARP的pGG 5 PCa患者BCRFS、MFS和CRPC-FS的重要预测指标。

相似文献

1
Prognostic factors among patients with pathological Grade Group 5 prostate cancer based on robot-associated radical prostatectomy specimens from a large Japanese cohort (MSUG94).基于日本大型队列(MSUG94)机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术标本的5级病理分组前列腺癌患者的预后因素
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 14;42(1):152. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04864-y.
2
Prognostic Importance of Lymphovascular Invasion for Specific Subgroup of Patients with Prostate Cancer After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (The MSUG94 Group).前列腺癌患者接受机器人辅助前列腺根治术后特定亚组患者的淋巴血管侵犯的预后意义(MSUG94 组)。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar;31(3):2154-2162. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14691-x. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
3
Clinical Factors Associated With Pathological Grade Group 1 Patients in D'Amico Intermediate-Risk Group Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan (The MSUG94 Group).日本(MSUG94 组)机器人辅助前列腺根治术后 D'Amico 中危组 1 级病理分级相关临床因素的回顾性多中心队列研究。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022 Dec;20(6):593-600. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
4
Clinical factors associated with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion followed by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a retrospective multicenter cohort study in Japan (the MSUG94 group).日本多中心回顾性队列研究(MSUG94组):与精囊侵犯性前列腺癌生化复发相关的临床因素及机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1609-1617. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01567-1. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
5
Prognostic differences among the positive surgical margin locations following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a large Japanese cohort (the MSUG94 group).在一个大型日本队列(MSUG94 组)中,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后阳性切缘位置的预后差异。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2023 Apr 29;53(5):443-451. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyad004.
6
Short-term oncological and surgical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A retrospective multicenter cohort study in Japan (the MSUG94 group).机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的短期肿瘤学和手术结果:日本(MSUG94 组)的回顾性多中心队列研究。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Oct;15(4):745-752. doi: 10.1111/ases.13074. Epub 2022 May 4.
7
The Impact of Gleason Grade 3 as a Predictive Factor for Biochemical Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan (The MSUG94 Group).《日本机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术术后生化复发预测因子:Gleason 分级 3 的影响:回顾性多中心队列研究(MSUG94 组)》。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jul 25;58(8):990. doi: 10.3390/medicina58080990.
8
The presence of prostate-specific antigen checked more than 1 year before diagnostic biopsy is an independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.在诊断性活检前 1 年以上检查前列腺特异性抗原是接受根治性前列腺切除术患者的独立预后因素。
Investig Clin Urol. 2021 Jul;62(4):438-446. doi: 10.4111/icu.20200545. Epub 2021 May 24.
9
Intermediate-term cancer control outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.接受机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者的中期癌症控制结果:一项多机构分析。
World J Urol. 2016 Oct;34(10):1357-66. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1781-y. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
10
Oncologic Outcomes After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Large European Single-centre Cohort with Median 10-Year Follow-up.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤学结果:一项具有 10 年中位随访时间的大型欧洲单中心队列研究。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Apr;4(3):351-359. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Mortality in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Definitive Therapies: A Narrative Review.接受确定性治疗的前列腺癌患者的总生存期和癌症特异性死亡率:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 19;13(18):5561. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185561.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic differences among the positive surgical margin locations following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a large Japanese cohort (the MSUG94 group).在一个大型日本队列(MSUG94 组)中,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后阳性切缘位置的预后差异。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2023 Apr 29;53(5):443-451. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyad004.
2
Effect of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy on cancer-specific mortality in high/very high-risk prostate cancer patients with Gleason Grade Group 4-5.根治性前列腺切除术中切缘阳性对 Gleason 分级组 4-5 的高/极高风险前列腺癌患者癌症特异性死亡率的影响。
Prostate. 2023 Feb;83(3):268-276. doi: 10.1002/pros.24458. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
3
Short-term oncological and surgical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A retrospective multicenter cohort study in Japan (the MSUG94 group).
机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的短期肿瘤学和手术结果:日本(MSUG94 组)的回顾性多中心队列研究。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Oct;15(4):745-752. doi: 10.1111/ases.13074. Epub 2022 May 4.
4
PI-RADS v2 Findings of MRI and Positive Biopsy Core Percentage would Predict Pathological Extraprostatic Extension in Patients who Underwent Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Study.PI-RADS v2版MRI检查结果与阳性活检核心比例可预测接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者的病理前列腺外侵犯:一项回顾性研究
Urol J. 2022 Dec 6;19(6):438-444. doi: 10.22037/uj.v19i.6923.
5
Outcomes following radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation for veterans with Gleason 9 and 10 prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术或外照射治疗 Gleason 评分 9 分和 10 分前列腺癌退伍军人的结果。
Cancer Med. 2022 Aug;11(15):2886-2895. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4656. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
6
Pattern of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group 5 (4 + 5 vs 5 + 4 vs 5 + 5) Predicts Survival After Radical Prostatectomy or External Beam Radiation Therapy.活检 Gleason 评分 5 级分组模式(4+5 对 5+4 对 5+5)预测根治性前列腺切除术或外照射治疗后的生存情况。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 May;8(3):710-717. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
7
Oncologic outcomes among Black and White men with grade group 4 or 5 (Gleason score 8-10) prostate cancer treated primarily by radical prostatectomy.黑人与白人中等级分组 4 或 5(Gleason 评分 8-10)前列腺癌患者,经根治性前列腺切除术治疗后的肿瘤学结局。
Cancer. 2021 May 1;127(9):1425-1431. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33419. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
8
Evaluation of Gleason Grade Group 5 in a Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System and Literature Review.当代前列腺癌分级系统中 Gleason 分级组 5 的评估及文献复习。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021 Feb;19(1):69-75.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
9
The Significance of Primary Biopsy Gleason 5 in Patients with Grade Group 5 Prostate Cancer.原发性活检 Gleason 5 在 5 级分组前列腺癌患者中的意义。
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Mar 15;6(2):255-258. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
10
Survival outcomes of radical prostatectomy vs. external beam radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients with Gleason Score 9-10 at biopsy: A population-based analysis.在前列腺活检中格里森评分 9-10 的前列腺癌患者中,根治性前列腺切除术与外照射放疗的生存结局比较:一项基于人群的分析。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Mar;38(3):79.e9-79.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.09.015. Epub 2019 Oct 23.