• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于牙科植入物应用的多向与单向碳纤维框架的机械特性研究。

Mechanical characterisation of multi vs. uni-directional carbon fiber frameworks for dental implant applications.

机构信息

Implant and Prosthetic Dentistry Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, Ospedale S. Martino (pad. 4), L. Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy.

Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genoa, Via Montallegro, 1, 16145 Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019 Sep;102:186-191. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.036. Epub 2019 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.036
PMID:31146989
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to investigate the mechanical characteristics of dental implant frameworks made of unidirectional carbon fiber composite (UF) and to compare them with those provided by multidirectional carbon fiber composite (IF).

METHODS

8 identical UF samples were used. The samples were initially evaluated by optical microscope and SEM then non-destructive and destructive mechanical tests were performed on 4 samples in order to evaluate dynamic, static elastic modulus, wettability and ultimate strength. The outcomes were compared with those of IF samples tested following the same protocol - data reported in a previous published paper. The remaining 4 samples were aged for 60 days in isotonic saline solution at 37 °C simulating the human saliva. The same tests reported before were performed on the aged samples.

RESULTS

The dynamic elastic modulus was lower for UF (78.1 GPa for UF vs. 92.2 GPa for IF) as well as the static elastic modulus (71.0 GPa for UF vs. 84.5 GPa for IF). The ultimate strength value was 582 MPa for the IF samples and 700 MPa for the UF. The aging process of the UF samples did not show any appreciable variation, with small differences that falls within the experimental error.

SIGNIFICANCE

Unidirectional carbon fiber-reinforced composite appears suitable for the fabrication of frameworks for implant-supported full-arch dentures. The dynamic elastic modulus was higher for UF while the static elastic modulus was higher for IF. The aging process seems not able to significantly alter the mechanical properties of the material. Further research is needed to evaluate the clinical significance of such outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在研究单向碳纤维复合材料(UF)制成的牙种植体支架的机械特性,并将其与多向碳纤维复合材料(IF)的特性进行比较。

方法

使用 8 个相同的 UF 样本。首先通过光学显微镜和 SEM 对样品进行评估,然后对 4 个样品进行无损和破坏性机械测试,以评估动态、静态弹性模量、润湿性和极限强度。结果与按照相同方案测试的 IF 样本进行比较 - 数据报告在之前发表的一篇论文中。其余 4 个样本在 37°C 的等渗盐溶液中老化 60 天,模拟人体唾液。对老化样本进行了之前报告的相同测试。

结果

UF 的动态弹性模量较低(UF 为 78.1 GPa,IF 为 92.2 GPa),静态弹性模量也较低(UF 为 71.0 GPa,IF 为 84.5 GPa)。IF 样本的极限强度值为 582 MPa,UF 样本为 700 MPa。UF 样本的老化过程没有显示出任何明显的变化,只有在实验误差范围内的微小差异。

意义

单向碳纤维增强复合材料似乎适合用于制造种植体支持的全口义齿支架。UF 的动态弹性模量较高,IF 的静态弹性模量较高。老化过程似乎不能显著改变材料的机械性能。需要进一步研究来评估这些结果的临床意义。

相似文献

1
Mechanical characterisation of multi vs. uni-directional carbon fiber frameworks for dental implant applications.用于牙科植入物应用的多向与单向碳纤维框架的机械特性研究。
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019 Sep;102:186-191. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.036. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
2
Biological and mechanical characterization of carbon fiber frameworks for dental implant applications.用于牙种植体应用的碳纤维框架的生物学和力学特性
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Jan 1;70(Pt 1):646-655. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.09.047. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
3
Flexural properties of polyethylene, glass and carbon fiber-reinforced resin composites for prosthetic frameworks.用于修复体支架的聚乙烯、玻璃和碳纤维增强树脂复合材料的弯曲性能。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2015;73(8):581-7. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2014.958875. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
4
Stability and aging resistance of a zirconia oral implant using a carbon fiber-reinforced screw for implant-abutment connection.碳纤维增强螺钉用于种植体-基台连接的氧化锆口腔种植体的稳定性和抗老化性。
Dent Mater. 2018 Oct;34(10):1585-1595. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.290. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
5
The flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composite with light-polymerized polymer matrix.具有光聚合聚合物基体的纤维增强复合材料的弯曲性能。
Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Jan-Feb;14(1):33-9.
6
Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone.聚醚醚酮(PEEK)牙种植体对种植体周围骨生物力学影响的有限元分析
J Biomech. 2015 Jan 2;48(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.017. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
7
Dynamic and static strength of an implant-supported overdenture model reinforced with metal and nonmetal strengtheners.种植体支持覆盖义齿模型的动静态强度:金属和非金属增强体的强化作用。
J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Nov;106(5):297-304. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60134-0.
8
Mechanical and physical properties of carbon-graphite fiber-reinforced polymers intended for implant suprastructures.用于种植体上部结构的碳石墨纤维增强聚合物的机械和物理性能。
Dent Mater. 2007 Sep;23(9):1150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.050. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
9
Carbon fibre versus metal framework in full-arch immediate loading rehabilitations of the maxilla - a cohort clinical study.碳纤维与金属框架在上颌全牙弓即刻负重修复中的对比——一项队列临床研究
J Oral Rehabil. 2017 May;44(5):392-397. doi: 10.1111/joor.12493. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
10
Effect of thermal cycling on flexural properties of carbon-graphite fiber-reinforced polymers.热循环对碳石墨纤维增强聚合物弯曲性能的影响。
Dent Mater. 2009 Jul;25(7):845-51. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.12.007. Epub 2009 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Fiber-Reinforced Composites for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: An In Vitro Study.用于全牙弓种植体支持修复的纤维增强复合材料:一项体外研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 2;13(7):2060. doi: 10.3390/jcm13072060.
2
Static and Fatigue Mechanical Performance of Abutments Materials for Dental Restorations.牙科修复基台材料的静态和疲劳力学性能
Materials (Basel). 2023 May 13;16(10):3713. doi: 10.3390/ma16103713.
3
Comparison of Milled Full-Arch Implant-Supported Frameworks Realised with a Full Digital Workflow or from Conventional Impression: A Clinical Study.
全数字化工作流程与传统印模制作的研磨全牙弓种植支持式框架的比较:一项临床研究
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jan 15;16(2):833. doi: 10.3390/ma16020833.
4
Roughness and SEM Analysis of Manual and Ultrasonic Instrumentation over Different Crown Materials for Dental Implants Restorations.用于牙种植体修复的不同冠材料上手动和超声器械操作的粗糙度及扫描电子显微镜分析
Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 2;15(3):1159. doi: 10.3390/ma15031159.
5
Framework Materials for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.全牙弓种植支持修复的框架材料:临床研究的系统评价
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 12;14(12):3251. doi: 10.3390/ma14123251.