Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, United Kingdom.
Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, United Kingdom.
J Biomech. 2019 Jul 19;92:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.05.024. Epub 2019 May 22.
The aim of this study was to analyze footstrike patterns in elite marathon runners at the 2017 IAAF World Championships. Seventy-one men and 78 women were analyzed in their respective races. Athletes' footstrike patterns were recorded (120 Hz) at approximately 8.5, 19, 29.5 and 40 km ("Laps 1 - 4") and categorized as either rearfoot (RFS), midfoot or forefoot striking; the latter two were classified together as non-rearfoot striking (NRFS). The most common footstrike pattern was RFS, with proportions never less than 54% of men or 67% of women at any distance. There were no sex-based differences for proportion of footstrike patterns, and there were no differences between footstrike proportions when comparing the top and bottom 50% of men finishers, or between women during Laps 1 and 2. A greater proportion of the top 50% of women maintained NRFS than amongst the bottom 50%. The proportion of RFS increased with distance run in the men's race, although more than 75% of athletes across both marathons had consistent footstrike patterns between laps (79 RFS and 36 NRFS). As most athletes were RFS (including the top four finishing men), there appears to be no clear advantage to NRFS in marathon running. Coaches should note that it is normal for elite marathon runners to be either RFS or NRFS; however, forefoot striking was rare. The high proportion of athletes who maintained their footstrike pattern reflected individualized preferences for a given footstrike pattern.
本研究旨在分析 2017 年国际田联世界锦标赛上精英马拉松运动员的足着地模式。在各自的比赛中,分析了 71 名男性和 78 名女性运动员。以大约 8.5、19、29.5 和 40 公里(“第 1-4 圈”)记录运动员的足着地模式(120Hz),并将其归类为后跟(RFS)、中足或前足着地;后两者被归类为非后跟(NRFS)着地。最常见的足着地模式是 RFS,在任何距离,男性的比例从不低于 54%,女性的比例从不低于 67%。男女之间的足着地模式比例没有性别差异,比较男女前 50%完赛者的足着地比例或男女第一和第二圈的足着地比例都没有差异。与后 50%的女性相比,前 50%的女性保持 NRFS 的比例更高。在男子比赛中,随着跑步距离的增加,RFS 的比例增加,尽管在两个马拉松比赛中,超过 75%的运动员在各圈之间保持着一致的足着地模式(79 次 RFS 和 36 次 NRFS)。由于大多数运动员都是 RFS(包括前四名完赛的男子),因此 NRFS 在马拉松跑步中似乎没有明显的优势。教练应该注意,精英马拉松运动员是 RFS 或 NRFS 是正常的;然而,前足着地很少见。大多数运动员保持其足着地模式的比例反映了他们对特定足着地模式的个性化偏好。